The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological Control of Chestnut Blight in Europe
Abstract
Cryphonectria parasitica (Murr.) Barr. (Syn. Endothia parasitica (Murr.) And. & And.), the causal agent of chestnut blight, is a fungal pathogen of Castanea and Quercus species. After its introduction at the beginning of this century, C. parasitica virtually eliminated C. dentata Borkh. as an important forest tree species in the eastern United States. A similar result was anticipated when chestnut blight was found in Europe, but the unexpected appearance of transmissible hypovirulence–a unique natural biocontrol phenomenon–prevented the European chestnut (C. sativa Mill.) from succumbing to the blight (for reviews see 5, 51, 69, 92, 101, 103, 130). Castanea sativa was introduced by the Romans from Minor Asia (79). This tree species was formerly of major economic importance in the mountainous areas of Southern Europe, in the southern foothills of the Alps from Italy into Hungary, and along the Black Sea. It provided timber, firewood, tannin, and litter bed on marginal land, and produced nuts for human consumption and animal forage. Chestnuts are traditionally grown as coppices with a rotation period of 15 to 30 years, as coppices with standards, in high forests, and in orchards. The latter are often formed of old-growth giant trees (100 years is not uncommon), grafted with the local varieties (Figure 1). Socioeconomic changes and the introduction of the devastating chestnut blight (C. parasitica) caused a rapid decline in chestnut cultivation in many regions after the second world war (54, 76). Natural dissemination of hypovirulence has allowed many chestnut stands to recover. Renewed interest in this tree species and the economic importance of its nuts (3) led to a revival of chestnut cultivation in Europe. Selected nut-producing varieties of C. sativa are now cultivated in plantations. This review concentrates on the epidemic of chestnut blight in Europe, the biology of hypovirulence, and its effect on the phytosanitary situation in European chestnut stands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chestnut Blight: The Classical Problem of an Introduced Pathogen
Anagnostakis, S. L. (1987) · Mycologia · doi:10.1080/00275514.1987.12025367 · Cited by 686
Hypovirulence of Chestnut Blight Fungus Conferred by an Infectious Viral cDNA
Choi, G. H., & Nuss, D. L. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1496400 · Cited by 367
Shapira, R., Choi, G. H., & Nuss, D. L. (1991) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08004.x · Cited by 204
Double-stranded RNA in Endothia parasitica
Day, P. R. (1977) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-67-1393 · Cited by 171
Diversity of Vegetative Compatibility Groups ofCryphonectria parasiticain Connecticut and Europe
Anagnostakis, S. L. (1986) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pd-70-536 · Cited by 114
Shapira, R., Choi, G. H., Hillman, B. I., & Nuss, D. L. (1991) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08005.x · Cited by 96
Oxalate production by virulent but not by hypovirulent strains of Endothia parasitica
Havir, E. A., & Anagnostakis, S. L. (1983) · Physiological Plant Pathology · doi:10.1016/0048-4059(83)90021-8 · Cited by 85
Population Dynamics ofCryphonectria parasiticain a Mixed-Hardwood Forest in Connecticut
Anagnostakis, S. L. (1987) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-77-751 · Cited by 65
Estimation of the outcrossing rate in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica
Milgroom, M. G., Lipari, S. E., Ennos, R. A., & Liu, Y.-C. (1993) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1993.54 · Cited by 51
L'Hostis, B., Hiremath, S., Rhoads, R. E., et al. (1985) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/0022-1317-66-2-351 · Cited by 31
Cited by
Rigling, D., & Prospero, S. (2018) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/mpp.12542 · Cited by 478
Maharachchikumbura, S. S. N., Hyde, K. D., Jones, E. B. G., McKenzie, E. H. C., Bhat, J. D., Dayarathne, M. C., Huang, S.-K., Norphanphoun, C., Senanayake, I. C., Perera, R. H., et al. (2016) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-016-0369-6 · Cited by 439
Chiba, S., Salaipeth, L., Lin, Y.-H., Sasaki, A., Kanematsu, S., & Suzuki, N. (2009) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01830-09 · Cited by 286
Forest pathogens with higher damage potential due to climate change in Europe
La Porta, N., Capretti, P., Thomsen, I. M., Kasanen, R., Hietala, A. M., & Von Weissenberg, K. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1080/07060661.2008.10540534 · Cited by 264
Jacobs, D. F., Dalgleish, H. J., & Nelson, C. D. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12020 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Heiniger, U.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 581-599
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119992952
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Control of Chestnut Blight in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.32.1.581
- The paper
- Heiniger, U. (1994). Biological Control of Chestnut Blight in Europe. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.32.1.581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.