The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
P HYTOALEXINS: What Have We Learned After 60 Years?
Abstract
▪ Abstract One of the best and longest-studied defense response of plants to infection is the induced accumulation of antimicrobial, low-molecular-weight secondary metabolites known as phytoalexins. Since the phytoalexin hypothesis was first proposed in 1940, a role for these compounds in defense has been revealed through several experimental approaches. Support has come, for example, through studies on the rate of phytoalexins in relation to cessation of pathogen development, quantification of phytoalexins at the infection site, and relationship of pathogen virulence to the phytoalexin tolerance. Evidence in support of phytoalexins in resistance as well some recent advances in phytoalexin biosynthesis are reviewed. Criteria for evaluating a role for phytoalexins in disease resistance are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenolic Compounds and Their Role in Disease Resistance
Nicholson, R. L., & Hammerschmidt, R. (1992) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.002101 · Cited by 1,400
Self-citationTwo Classes of Plant Antibiotics: Phytoalexins versus "Phytoanticipins"
VanEtten, H. D., Mansfield, J. W., Bailey, J. A., & Farmer, E. E. (1994) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.6.9.1191 · Cited by 710
Cited by
MAPK Cascades in Plant Disease Resistance Signaling
Meng, X., & Zhang, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102314 · Cited by 1,367
Significance of flavonoids in plant resistance: a review
Treutter, D. (2006) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-006-0068-8 · Cited by 1,253
El Hadrami, A., Adam, L. R., El Hadrami, I., & Daayf, F. (2010) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md8040968 · Cited by 783
Signal Crosstalk and Induced Resistance: Straddling the Line Between Cost and Benefit
Bostock, R. M. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095505 · Cited by 615
Simões, M., Bennett, R. N., & Rosa, E. A. S. (2009) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b821648g · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammerschmidt, R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 285-306
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2096286551
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: P HYTOALEXINS: What Have We Learned After 60 Years? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.285
- The paper
- Hammerschmidt, R. (1999). P HYTOALEXINS: What Have We Learned After 60 Years? Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
