The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
C ULTURAL AND G ENETIC A PPROACHES TO M ANAGING M YCOTOXINS IN M AIZE
Abstract
▪ Abstract Infection of maize kernels by toxigenic fungi remains a challenging problem despite decades of research progress. Cultural practices, including crop rotation, tillage, planting date, and management of irrigation and fertilization, have limited effects on infection and subsequent mycotoxin accumulation. Current infrastructure and grain storage practices in developed countries can prevent postharvest development of mycotoxins, but this aspect remains a threat in developing countries, especially in tropical areas. Because most mycotoxin problems develop in the field, strategies are needed to prevent infection of growing plants by toxigenic fungi. Developing genetic resistance to Aspergillus flavus, Gibberella zeae, and Fusarium spp. (particularly F. verticillioides) in maize is a high priority. Sources of resistance to each of these pathogens have been identified and have been incorporated into public and private breeding programs. However, few, if any, commercial cultivars have adequate levels of resistance. Efforts to control infection or mycotoxin development through conventional breeding and genetic engineering are reviewed. The role of transgenic insect control in the prevention of mycotoxins in maize is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Previous Crop Residues and Tillage on Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat
Dill-Macky, R., & Jones, R. K. (2000) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis.2000.84.1.71 · Cited by 588
Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat and Barley
Leonard, K. J., & Bushnell, W. R. (2003) · Cited by 583
Trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium species: chemistry, genetics, and significance
Desjardins, A. E., Hohn, T. M., & McCormick, S. P. (1993) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.57.3.595-604.1993 · Cited by 451
Munkvold, G. P., Hellmich, R. L., & Rice, L. G. (1999) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis.1999.83.2.130 · Cited by 368
Self-citationProctor, R. H., Desjardins, A. E., Plattner, R. D., & Hohn, T. M. (1999) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1006/fgbi.1999.1141 · Cited by 348
GENETICS AND PHYSIOLOGY OF AFLATOXIN BIOSYNTHESIS
Payne, G. A., & Brown, M. P. (1998) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.329 · Cited by 336
Risk Assessment Models for Wheat Fusarium Head Blight Epidemics Based on Within-Season Weather Data
De Wolf, E. D., Madden, L. V., & Lipps, P. E. (2003) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto.2003.93.4.428 · Cited by 319
Munkvold, G. P., Hellmich, R. L., & Showers, W. B. (1997) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto.1997.87.10.1071 · Cited by 252
Self-citationSeo, J., Proctor, R. H., & Plattner, R. D. (2001) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1006/fgbi.2001.1299 · Cited by 214
Bakan, B., Melcion, D., Richard-Molard, D., & Cahagnier, B. (2002) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0108258 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Savary, S., Ficke, A., Aubertot, J.-N., & Hollier, C. (2012) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-012-0200-5 · Cited by 1,208
Wagacha, J. M., & Muthomi, J. W. (2008) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.01.008 · Cited by 608
Teller, R. S., Schmidt, R. J., Whitlow, L. W., & Kung, L. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4610 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Munkvold, G. P.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-116
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2110803586
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: C ULTURAL AND G ENETIC A PPROACHES TO M ANAGING M YCOTOXINS IN M AIZE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095510
- The paper
- Munkvold, G. P. (2003). C ULTURAL AND G ENETIC A PPROACHES TO M ANAGING M YCOTOXINS IN M AIZE. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
