The DOI matches its Crossref record.
R EGULATION OF A NTIBIOTIC P RODUCTION IN R OOT-C OLONIZING P SEUDOMONAS SPP. AND R ELEVANCE FOR B IOLOGICAL C ONTROL OF P LANT D ISEASE
Abstract
▪ Abstract Certain strains of fluorescent pseudomonads are important biological components of agricultural soils that are suppressive to diseases caused by pathogenic fungi on crop plants. The biocontrol abilities of such strains depend essentially on aggressive root colonization, induction of systemic resistance in the plant, and the production of diffusible or volatile antifungal antibiotics. Evidence that these compounds are produced in situ is based on their chemical extraction from the rhizosphere and on the expression of antibiotic biosynthetic genes in the producer strains colonizing plant roots. Well-characterized antibiotics with biocontrol properties include phenazines, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, pyoluteorin, pyrrolnitrin, lipopeptides, and hydrogen cyanide. In vitro, optimal production of these compounds occurs at high cell densities and during conditions of restricted growth, involving (i) a number of transcriptional regulators, which are mostly pathway-specific, and (ii) the GacS/GacA two-component system, which globally exerts a positive effect on the production of extracellular metabolites at a posttranscriptional level. Small untranslated RNAs have important roles in the GacS/GacA signal transduction pathway. One challenge in future biocontrol research involves development of new strategies to overcome the broad toxicity and lack of antifungal specificity displayed by most biocontrol antibiotics studied so far.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling
Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., & Remans, R. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00072.x · Cited by 1,954
Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity
Barrios, E. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004 · Cited by 1,067
Metadata
- Authors
- Haas, D., & Keel, C.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-153
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2109304737
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: R EGULATION OF A NTIBIOTIC P RODUCTION IN R OOT-C OLONIZING P SEUDOMONAS SPP. AND R ELEVANCE FOR B IOLOGICAL C ONTROL OF P LANT D ISEASE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095656
- The paper
- Haas, D., & Keel, C. (2003). R EGULATION OF A NTIBIOTIC P RODUCTION IN R OOT-C OLONIZING P SEUDOMONAS SPP. AND R ELEVANCE FOR B IOLOGICAL C ONTROL OF P LANT D ISEASE. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.