The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Gene Expression in Response to Mechanical Wounding and Insect Feeding in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Wounding in multicellular eukaryotes results in marked changes in gene expression that contribute to tissue defense and repair. Using a cDNA microarray technique, we analyzed the timing, dynamics, and regulation of the expression of 150 genes in mechanically wounded leaves of Arabidopsis. Temporal accumulation of a group of transcripts was correlated with the appearance of oxylipin signals of the jasmonate family. Analysis of the coronatine-insensitive coi1-1 Arabidopsis mutant that is also insensitive to jasmonate allowed us to identify a large number of COI1-dependent and COI1-independent wound-inducible genes. Water stress was found to contribute to the regulation of an unexpectedly large fraction of these genes. Comparing the results of mechanical wounding with damage by feeding larvae of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris rapae) resulted in very different transcript profiles. One gene was specifically induced by insect feeding but not by wounding; moreover, there was a relative lack of water stress-induced gene expression during insect feeding. These results help reveal a feeding strategy of P. rapae that may minimize the activation of a subset of water stress-inducible, defense-related genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Cited by
Seki, M., Narusaka, M., Ishida, J., Nanjo, T., Fujita, M., Oono, Y., Kamiya, A., Nakajima, M., Enju, A., Sakurai, T., et al. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01359.x · Cited by 1,924
Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction
Gatehouse, J. A. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00519.x · Cited by 704
Kennedy, D. O., & Wightman, E. L. (2011) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.110.000117 · Cited by 684
Song, S., Qi, T., Huang, H., Ren, Q., Wu, D., Chang, C., Peng, W., Liu, Y., Peng, J., & Xie, D. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083089 · Cited by 608
Ferrari, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00049 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Reymond, P., Weber, H., Damond, M., & Farmer, E. E.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 707-719
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2118278450
- Cited by
- 1,227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 156.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Gene Expression in Response to Mechanical Wounding and Insect Feeding in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.12.5.707
- The paper
- Reymond, P., Weber, H., Damond, M., & Farmer, E. E. (2000). Differential Gene Expression in Response to Mechanical Wounding and Insect Feeding in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.5.707
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.