The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
T AKING S TOCK: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics
Abstract
▪ Abstract Constructivism is an approach to social analysis that deals with the role of human consciousness in social life. It asserts that human interaction is shaped primarily by ideational factors, not simply material ones; that the most important ideational factors are widely shared or “intersubjective” beliefs, which are not reducible to individuals; and that these shared beliefs construct the interests of purposive actors. In international relations, research in a constructivist mode has exploded over the past decade, creating new and potentially fruitful connections with long-standing interest in these issues in comparative politics. In this essay, we evaluate the empirical research program of constructivism in these two fields. We first lay out the basic tenets of constructivism and examine their implications for research methodology, concluding that constructivism's distinctiveness lies in its theoretical arguments, not in its empirical research strategies. The bulk of the essay explores specific constructivist literatures and debates in international relations and comparative politics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games
Putnam, R. D. (1988) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027697 · Cited by 7,475
Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain
Hall, P. A. (1993) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422246 · Cited by 7,369
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
The agent-structure problem in international relations theory
Wendt, A. E. (1987) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830002751x · Cited by 1,896
Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics
ADLER, E. (1997) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066197003003003 · Cited by 1,446
Global Prohibition Regimes: the Evolution of Norms in International Society
Nadelmann, E. A. (1990) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300035384 · Cited by 989
Cited by
The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507 · Cited by 1,379
Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union
Jupille, J., Caporaso, J. A., & Checkel, J. T. (2003) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414002239370 · Cited by 420
What’s in a name? Contestation and backlash against international norms and institutions
Deitelhoff, N. (2020) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/1369148120945906 · Cited by 67
Global Democratization: Soup, Society, or System?
Dryzek, J. S. (2011) · Ethics & International Affairs · doi:10.1017/s0892679411000074 · Cited by 62
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Genesis and Design1
Nagy, R. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société · doi:10.1017/cls.2014.8 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Political Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 391-416
- ISSN
- 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1577
- OpenAlex
- W2148443044
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 43.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T AKING S TOCK: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
- The paper
- Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). T AKING S TOCK: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.