Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics
Abstract
In recent years, a great deal has been written about a `constructivist' approach in International Relations, which argues that international reality is socially constructed by cognitive structures that give meaning to the material world. Nevertheless, most of the epistemological, theoretical, empirical and methodological foundations of constructivism remain unclear. Nor are its potential contributions to a better understanding of International Relations widely appreciated. The present article seeks to fill some of these gaps. Constructivism occupies the middle ground between rationalist approaches (whether realist or liberal) and interpretive approaches (mainly postmodernist, poststructuralist and critical), and creates new areas for theoretical and empirical investigation. The bulk of the article lays out the social-epistemological basis of the constructivist approach; juxtaposes constructivism to rationalism and poststructuralism and explains its advantages; presents the concept of cognitive evolution as a way of explaining the social construction of reality; and suggests ways of expanding constructivist research agendas.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The tension in Wendt's work does not bode well for the move whereby constructivists situate themselves between rationalists and 'more radical interpretivists'.
“Thus, I conclude by suggesting that the tension in Wendt's work does not bode well for the move whereby constructivists situate themselves between rationalists and 'more radical interpretivists' (Adler, 1997).”
From Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison (2001) · cites this paper as Adler, 1997
The 'via media' or 'middle ground' where Wendt and some other constructivists aim to locate their approaches may not be as stable a place as they think.
“The 'via media' (Wendt, 1999: 40 and 47) or 'middle ground' (Adler, 1997), where Wendt and some other constructivists clearly aim to locate their approaches, may just not be as stable a place as they think.”
From Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison (2001) · cites this paper as Adler, 1997
Cites
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225 · see citing works
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
Hacking, I. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814563 · Cited by 4,814 · see citing works
Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers.
Wentzel, K. R. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202 · Cited by 1,828 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use
Tannenwald, N. (1999) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081899550959 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research
Witt, M. A. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Diasporas and International Relations Theory
Shain, Y., & Barth, A. (2003) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818303573015 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison
ZEHFUSS, M. (2001) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066101007003002 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
The Emerging Fourth Wave of Deterrence Theory-Toward a New Research Agenda
Lupovici, A. (2010) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00606.x · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Threats and Alliances in the Middle East: Saudi and Syrian Policies in a Turbulent Region
Darwich, M. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108656689 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- ADLER, E.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- ADLER, EMANUEL
- ORCID
- ADLER, EMANUEL
- Venue
- European Journal of International Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319-363
- ISSN
- 1354-0661 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3713
- OpenAlex
- W2159854289
- Cited by
- 1,446
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 116.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of International Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Keywords
- constructivism, social construction of reality, cognitive evolution, social epistemology, rationalism, poststructuralism, postmodernism, critical theory, international relations theory, epistemology of international relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review