Cited by 1,446International Relations and Foreign PolicyPolitical Science Research and EducationCritical Realism in Sociology

Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics

ADLER, EMANUEL·1997·European Journal of International Relations

Abstract

In recent years, a great deal has been written about a `constructivist' approach in International Relations, which argues that international reality is socially constructed by cognitive structures that give meaning to the material world. Nevertheless, most of the epistemological, theoretical, empirical and methodological foundations of constructivism remain unclear. Nor are its potential contributions to a better understanding of International Relations widely appreciated. The present article seeks to fill some of these gaps. Constructivism occupies the middle ground between rationalist approaches (whether realist or liberal) and interpretive approaches (mainly postmodernist, poststructuralist and critical), and creates new areas for theoretical and empirical investigation. The bulk of the article lays out the social-epistemological basis of the constructivist approach; juxtaposes constructivism to rationalism and poststructuralism and explains its advantages; presents the concept of cognitive evolution as a way of explaining the social construction of reality; and suggests ways of expanding constructivist research agendas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1354066197003003003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The tension in Wendt's work does not bode well for the move whereby constructivists situate themselves between rationalists and 'more radical interpretivists'.

    “Thus, I conclude by suggesting that the tension in Wendt's work does not bode well for the move whereby constructivists situate themselves between rationalists and 'more radical interpretivists' (Adler, 1997).”

    From Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison (2001) · cites this paper as Adler, 1997

  • The 'via media' or 'middle ground' where Wendt and some other constructivists aim to locate their approaches may not be as stable a place as they think.

    “The 'via media' (Wendt, 1999: 40 and 47) or 'middle ground' (Adler, 1997), where Wendt and some other constructivists clearly aim to locate their approaches, may just not be as stable a place as they think.”

    From Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison (2001) · cites this paper as Adler, 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ADLER, E.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
ADLER, EMANUEL
Venue
European Journal of International Relations
Published
1997-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
319-363
ISSN
  • 1354-0661 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3713
OpenAlex
W2159854289
Cited by
1,446
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 53
FWCI
116.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of International Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
Keywords
constructivism, social construction of reality, cognitive evolution, social epistemology, rationalism, poststructuralism, postmodernism, critical theory, international relations theory, epistemology of international relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review