Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Silicon and Plant Growth

Lewin, J, Reimann, B E F·1969·Annual Review of Plant Physiology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION More than a hundred years ago, Julius Sachs (53), one of the early pio­ neers of plant nutrition studies, asked in his article, Ergebnisse einiger neuerer Untersuchungen liber die in Pflanzen enthaltene Kieselsaure, the following questions: . . . whether silicic acid is an indispensable substance for those plants that contain silica, whether it takes part in the nutritional processes, and what is the relationship that exists between the uptake of sil­ icic acid and the life of the plant? These questions are still relevant today. A hundred years ago, however, the methods of plant physiology and bio­ chemistry were not well enough advanced to find a definitive answer to the questions that Sachs asked. He concluded on the basis of nutrition experi­ ments on Z ea mays and morphological observations made by Mohl (44) that . .. silicic acid is insignificant for the nutritional process of the maize plant. During the intervening years, many plant nutrition studies involving the use of water cultures have been made, and evidence both pro and con relative to Sachs' questions has accumulated. Today, the tendency of au­ thors of textbooks on plant physiology is to dismiss silicon as being of little importance in plant nutrition. For example, Epstein (12) in his chapter on mineral metabolism devotes only a single paragraph to silicon in higher plants, concluding, There seem to have been no physiological studies, like those with diatoms, that would throw light on the metabolic and biochemical .events resulting in these silica depositions in higher plants. On the other hand, if one surveys the published research appearing during the past 10 years, it is obvious that investigations seeking a possible role for silicon in plant nutrition are still continuing quite vigorously. Some rather new ap­ proaches have been tried and new data have been forthcoming which are certainly of interest, worth reviewing at this time, and which offer enough encouragement to make further investigations well worthwhile.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.pp.20.060169.001445

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Lewin, J., & Reimann, B. E. F.
Venue
Annual Review of Plant Physiology
Published
1969-06
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
289-304
ISSN
0066-4294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045934995
Cited by
315
References
0
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Silicon and Plant Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pp.20.060169.001445
The paper
Lewin, J., & Reimann, B. E. F. (1969). Silicon and Plant Growth. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.20.060169.001445

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.