Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Explanatory Models in Crop Physiology

Open access
Loomis, R S, Rabbinge, R, Ng, E·1979·Annual Review of Plant Physiology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION 340 THE MODELING PROCESS 343 HIERARCHIC LEVELS IN CROP GROWTH MODELS 345 Community/Ecosystem Level 346 Organ/Organisma/ Level 349 Cell/Tissue Level 354 SPECIAL ISSUES IN PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELING 355 Stochastic Versus Deterministic Simulation 355 Adaptation 356 APPLICATIONS 357 Productivity and Bioclimatology 358 Integrative Physiology and Ideotype Evaluation 359 Plant-Herbivore Relations 361 AN ASSESSMENT: SENSE OR NONSENSE 361

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.pp.30.060179.002011

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Loomis, R. S., Rabbinge, R., & Ng, E.
Venue
Annual Review of Plant Physiology
Published
1979-06
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
339-367
ISSN
0066-4294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2173021496
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explanatory Models in Crop Physiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pp.30.060179.002011
The paper
Loomis, R. S., Rabbinge, R., & Ng, E. (1979). Explanatory Models in Crop Physiology. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.30.060179.002011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.