Attitudes and Opinions

Fishbein, M, Ajzen, I·1972·Annual Review of Psychology

DOI 10.1146/annurev.ps.23.020172.002415

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ps.23.020172.002415

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature
Kraus, S. J. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167295211007 · Cited by 1,613
Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769910297506 · Cited by 1,611
What Happened at Hawthorne?: New evidence suggests the Hawthorne effect resulted from operant reinforcement contingencies.
Parsons, H. M. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.183.4128.922 · Cited by 615
Beyond Attitude Structure: Toward the Informational Determinants of Attitude
Holbrook, M. B. (1978) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150624 · Cited by 435
Are they different? Affect, feeling, emotion, sentiment, and opinion detection in text
Munezero, M., Montero, C. S., Sutinen, E., & Pajunen, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2014.2317187 · Cited by 374
The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments
Coppock, A., Hill, S. J., & Vavreck, L. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc4046 · Cited by 171
The relation of cognitive and memorial processes to persuasion in a simulated jury trial
Calder, B. J., Insko, C. A., & Yandell, B. (1974) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02808.x · Cited by 139

Authors: Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.
Venue: Annual Review of Psychology
Publisher: Annual Reviews
Published: 1972-01
Volume: 23
Issue: 1
Pages: 487-544
ISSN: 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
1545-2085
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.23.020172.002415
OpenAlex: W4242706981
Cited by: 338
References: 0
FWCI: 53.22
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review