Cited by 1,797Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementWorkplace Health and Well-being

Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace

Brief, Arthur P., Weiss, Howard M.·2002·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

▪ Abstract The study of affect in the workplace began and peaked in the 1930s, with the decades that followed up to the 1990s not being particularly fertile. Whereas job satisfaction generally continues to be loosely but not carefully thought of and measured as an affective state, critical work in the 1990s has raised serious questions about the affective status of job satisfaction in terms of its causes as well as its definition and measurement. Recent research has focused on the production of moods and emotions at work, with an emphasis, at least conceptually, on stressful events, leaders, work groups, physical settings, and rewards/punishment. Other recent research has addressed the consequences of workers' feelings, in particular, a variety of performance outcomes (e.g., helping behaviors and creativity). Even though recent interest in affect in the workplace has been intense, many theoretical and methodological opportunities and challenges remain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research into cognitive processing has identified three major sources of influence on how information is processed and evaluated: decision maker utility, affect, and heuristics.

    “Research into cognitive processing has identified three major sources of influence on how information is processed and evaluated: decision maker utility, affect, and heuristics [66-69].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 146 · Cited by 1,797

Authors
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2002-02
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
279-307
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2128954165
Cited by
1,797
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 104 · 2012: 117
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
job satisfaction, workplace emotions, mood, stressful events, leadership, work teams, physical work environment, reward and punishment, helping behavior, creativity, performance outcomes, affective states
MeSH terms
Affect, Behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Helping Behavior, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Leadership, Life Change Events, Problem Solving, Reward, Organizational Culture, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review