The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain
Abstract
Evidence from functional neuroimaging of the human brain indicates that information about salient properties of an object—such as what it looks like, how it moves, and how it is used—is stored in sensory and motor systems active when that information was acquired. As a result, object concepts belonging to different categories like animals and tools are represented in partially distinct, sensory- and motor property–based neural networks. This suggests that object concepts are not explicitly represented, but rather emerge from weighted activity within property-based brain regions. However, some property-based regions seem to show a categorical organization, thus providing evidence consistent with category-based, domain-specific formulations as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
Self-citationIntersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision
Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089506 · Cited by 1,839
Emotion and Cognition: Insights from Studies of the Human Amygdala
Phelps, E. A. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234 · Cited by 1,798
Damasio, A. R. (1989) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90005-x · Cited by 1,538
Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes
Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00196-3 · Cited by 1,339
Self-citationBadre, D., Poldrack, R. A., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Insler, R. Z., & Wagner, A. D. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.023 · Cited by 914
Category-Specific Cortical Activity Precedes Retrieval During Memory Search
Polyn, S. M., Natu, V. S., Cohen, J. D., & Norman, K. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117645 · Cited by 690
Perceptions of perceptual symbols
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99532147 · Cited by 620
Distributed Neural Systems for the Generation of Visual Images
Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00168-9 · Cited by 579
Cited by
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 · Cited by 5,936
Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain
Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2277 · Cited by 2,706
Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains
Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Gilmore, A. W., Newbold, D. J., Greene, D. J., Berg, J. J., Ortega, M., Hoyt-Drazen, C., Gratton, C., Sun, H., et al. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.011 · Cited by 1,335
A new neural framework for visuospatial processing
Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., & Mishkin, M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3008 · Cited by 1,325
Depression and obesity: evidence of shared biological mechanisms
Milaneschi, Y., Simmons, W. K., van Rossum, E. F. C., & Penninx, B. W. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0017-5 · Cited by 1,073
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-45
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2165116114
- Cited by
- 1,591
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
- The paper
- Martin, A. (2007). The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
