The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ecologic Studies in Epidemiology: Concepts, Principles, and Methods
Abstract
An ecologic study focuses on the comparison of groups, rather than individuals; thus, individual-level data are missing on the joint distribution, of variables within groups. Variables in an ecologic analysis may be aggregate measures, environmental measures, or global measures. The purpose of an ecologic analysis may be to make biologic inferences about effects on individual risks or to make ecologic inferences about effects on group rates. Ecologic study designs may be classified on two dimensions: (a) whether the primary group is measured (exploratory vs analytic study); and (b) whether subjects grouped by place (multiple-group study), by time (time-trend study), or place and time (mixed study). Despite several practical advantages of ecologic studies, there are many methodologic problems that severely limit causal inference, including ecologic and cross-level bias, problems of confounder control, within-group misclassification, lack of adequate data, temporal ambiguity, collinearity, and migration across groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis
Diez-Roux, A. V. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.2.216 · Cited by 1,317
The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology
Oakes, J. M. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.004 · Cited by 760
Putative contributors to the secular increase in obesity: exploring the roads less traveled
Keith, S. W., Redden, D. T., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Boggiano, M. M., Hanlon, E. C., Benca, R. M., Ruden, D., Pietrobelli, A., Barger, J. L., Fontaine, K. R., et al. (2006) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803326 · Cited by 659
Lung Cancer Incidence in Never Smokers
Wakelee, H. A., Chang, E. T., Gomez, S. L., Keegan, T. H., Feskanich, D., Clarke, C. A., Holmberg, L., Yong, L. C., Kolonel, L. N., Gould, M. K., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.2983 · Cited by 608
Ecological effects in multi-level studies
Blakely, T. A., & Woodward, A. J. (2000) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.54.5.367 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgenstern, H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Public Health
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-81
- ISSN
- 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2093
- OpenAlex
- W2124125947
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecologic Studies in Epidemiology: Concepts, Principles, and Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.000425
- The paper
- Morgenstern, H. (1995). Ecologic Studies in Epidemiology: Concepts, Principles, and Methods. Annual Review of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.000425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.