Cited by 99Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyWomen's cancer prevention and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating Clinical, Community, and Policy Perspectives on Human Papillomavirus Vaccination

Open access
Fernández, María E., Allen, Jennifer D., Mistry, Ritesh, Kahn, Jessica A.·2010·Annual Review of Public Health

Abstract

Infection with genital human papillomavirus (HPV) may cause anogenital cancers, oropharyngeal cancers, anogenital warts, and respiratory papillomas. Two prophylactic vaccines (a bivalent and a quadrivalent vaccine) are now licensed and currently in use in a number of countries. Both vaccines prevent infection with HPV-16 and HPV-18, which together cause ∼70% of cervical cancers, and clinical trials have demonstrated 90%–100% efficacy in preventing precancerous cervical lesions attributable to HPV-16 and HPV-18. One vaccine also prevents HPV-6 and HPV-11, which cause 90% of genital warts. A growing literature describes psychosocial, interpersonal, organizational, and societal factors that influence HPV vaccination acceptability. This review summarizes the current literature and presents an integrated perspective, taking into account these diverse influences. The resulting integrated framework can be used as a heuristic tool for organizing factors at multiple levels to guide intervention development and future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103609

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 124 references

2 of the 124 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Castellsague X, 2007, Vaccine, 25, c1
  2. Cent. Dis. Control Prev. Natl. Cent. Chron. Dis. Prev. Health Promot, 2008, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System: Youth Online: Comprehensive Results: United States 2007: Sexual behaviors: Percentage of students who have ever had sexual intercourse, by grade
  3. Euler GL, 2008, Vaccination coverage among U.S. adults: National Immunization Survey—Adult, 2007
  4. Harper D, 2008, Sustained immunogenicity and high efficacy against HPV-16/18 related cervical neoplasia: long-term follow up through 6.4 years in women vaccinated with Cervarix
  5. Inst. Med., 2004, Financing Vaccines in the 21st Century: Assuring Access and Availability
  6. 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00343-4 · DOI
  7. Jacobson VJ, 2005, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 3, CD003941
  8. Markowitz LE, 2007, MMWR Recomm. Rep., 56, 1
  9. Natl. Found. Infect. Dis., 2008, Call to action: Adolescent vaccination—bridging from a strong foundation to a healthy adulthood
  10. Schwarz EB, 2002, J. Gen. Intern. Med., 17, 250

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 99

Metadata

Authors
Fernández, M. E., Allen, J. D., Mistry, R., & Kahn, J. A.
Affiliations
  • School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030;
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Public Health
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
235-252
ISSN
  • 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2093
OpenAlex
W2113474001
Cited by
97
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI073713)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48DP000056, U48 DP000064, U48-DP000057)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccination, HPV vaccine, vaccine acceptance, psychosocial factors, interpersonal factors, organizational factors, social factors, cervical cancer prevention, HPV16, HPV 18, HPV 6, HPV 11, genital warts, oropharyngeal cancer, vaccination policy, intervention development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Child, Condylomata Acuminata, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Public Policy, United States, Human papillomavirus 11, Human papillomavirus 18, Human papillomavirus 16, Human papillomavirus 6, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review