The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Polymerase Chain Reaction and Plant Disease Diagnosis
Abstract
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) provides a simple, ingenious method to exponentially amplify specific DNA sequences by in vitro DNA synthesis. Three essential steps to PCR (Figure 1) include (a) melting of the target (b) annealing of two oligonucleotide primers to the denatured DNA strands, and (c) primer extension by a thermostable DNA polymerase (123). Newly synthesized DNA strands serve as targets for subsequent DNA synthesis as the three steps are repeated up to 50 times. The specificity of the method derives from the synthetic oligonucleotide primers, which base-pair to and define each end of the target sequence to be amplified. The use of PCR grew rapidly in plant pathology, as in other disciplines, with the introduction in 1988 of Thermus aquaticus (Taq) DNA polymerase. This enzyme exhibits relative stability at DNA-meltintgem peratures, which eliminates the need for enzyme replenishment after each cycle of synthesis, reduces PCR costs and allows automated thermal cycling. PCR offers several advantages compared to more traditional methods of diagnosis: organisms need not be cultured prior to their detection by PCR; the technique possesses exquisite sensitivity, with the theoretical potential to detect a single target molecule in a complex mixture without using radioactive probes; and it is rapid and versatile. Similar to serology, both narrow and broad selectivities are possible and, depending on the choice of primers, the method facilitates the detection of a single pathogen or many members of a group of related pathogens. Unlike serology, the development of reagents with narrow or broad specificities is accomplished almost at will with lower cost. Synthesis of hundreds of different PCR primers generates costs comparable to those of developing only a few monoclonal antibodies. Molecular genetic protocols in a variety of other disciplines employ PCR. Several reviews on its use and methodology in fields other than plant pathology have been published recently (4, 10, I1, 46, 46a, 91, 137). This review therefore focuses on the use of PCR for diagnosis of plant diseases and other applications in plant pathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Cited by
PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal
Schrader, C., Schielke, A., Ellerbroek, L., & Johne, R. (2012) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x · Cited by 2,118
Metadata
- Authors
- Henson, J. M., & French, R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-109
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2101666727
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Polymerase Chain Reaction and Plant Disease Diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.000501
- The paper
- Henson, J. M., & French, R. (1993). The Polymerase Chain Reaction and Plant Disease Diagnosis. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.000501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.