The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Data and Measurement
Abstract
Data on social networks may be gathered for all ties linking elements of a closed population (“complete” network data) or for the sets of ties surrounding sampled individual units (“egocentric” network data). Network data have been obtained via surveys and questionnaires, archives, observation, diaries, electronic traces, and experiments. Most methodological research on data quality concerns surveys and questionnaires. The question of the accuracy with which informants can provide data on their network ties is nontrivial, but survey methods can make some claim to reliability. Unresolved issues include whether to measure perceived social ties or actual exchanges, how to treat temporal elements in the definition of relationships, and whether to seek accurate descriptions or reliable indicators. Continued research on data quality is needed; beyond improved samples and further investigation of the informant accuracy/reliability issue, this should cover common indices of network structure, address the consequences of sampling portions of a network, and examine the robustness of indicators of network structure and position to both random and nonrandom errors of measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire.
Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.127 · Cited by 3,067
A Brief Measure of Social Support: Practical and Theoretical Implications
Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Shearin, E. N., & Pierce, G. R. (1987) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407587044007 · Cited by 1,977
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/63.2.482 · Cited by 1,731
Self-citationThe Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data
Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailer, L. (1984) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002431 · Cited by 896
Cited by
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
Structural Holes and Good Ideas
Burt, R. S. (2004) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/421787 · Cited by 5,642
Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation
Ibarra, H. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667055 · Cited by 2,702
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsden, P. V.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 435-463
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2148386842
- Cited by
- 2,176
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Data and Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.002251
- The paper
- Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network Data and Measurement. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.002251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.