Cited by 896Survey Methodology and NonresponseReliability and Agreement in MeasurementPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data

Bernard, H. Russell, Killworth, Peter, Kronenfeld, David, Sailer, Lee·1984·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

Lee Sailer Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 A measurement whose accuracy is completely unknown has no use whatever [Wilson ( 1 07. p. 232)]. A serious obstacle in the use of replications for increasing accuracy is the tendency to get closely agreeing repetitions for irrelevant reasons [Wilson (107. p. 253)1. My people don't lie to me (Anonymous Anthropologist).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002431

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailer, L.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
1984-10
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
495-517
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
OpenAlex
W2138386320
Cited by
896
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 47
FWCI
58.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
informant accuracy, retrospective data, measurement validity, replication, anthropological fieldwork

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review