The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Evolution of New Organizational Forms
Abstract
Rather quietly over the last decade, a large body of literature has emerged to consider how new forms of organization arise and become established in the organizational community. The literature represents a very wide array of theoretical perspectives, and no emerging consensus or dominant theme can plausibly be identified. No long stream of research has been produced to validate the arguments of any perspective. What we find instead is a disparate group of mostly nascent theories from organizational ecology, economics, institutional sociology, strategic management, and others, all seeking to explicate the nature of contexts and processes that may generate new organizational forms. This review organizes this literature according to assumptions about how variations are generated in the organizational community. Three perspectives appear to capture most of the arguments: an organizational genetics view, which emphasizes random variation; an environmental conditioning view, which considers variation to be contextually constrained; and an emergent social systems view, which considers variations in organizational forms to be the products of embedded social-organizational interactions. Theories associated with each of the perspectives are explicated, and their practical implications for future research are examined. The review concludes with a brief consideration of the theory of the evolution of new organizational forms as itself an evolution of a new and important field of study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.4 · Cited by 2,086
Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0232 · Cited by 1,707
Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change
Nelson, R. A. (2000) · Theorien der Organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-80840-0_5 · Cited by 1,307
The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances
Koza, M. P., & Lewin, A. Y. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.3.255 · Cited by 1,239
Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0522 · Cited by 1,066
Metadata
- Authors
- Romanelli, E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-103
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2144342950
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of New Organizational Forms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.000455
- The paper
- Romanelli, E. (1991). The Evolution of New Organizational Forms. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.000455
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.