Cited by 254Social Capital and NetworksSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Race and Trust

Smith, Sandra Susan·2010·Annual Review of Sociology

Abstract

This review considers that aspect of the voluminous trust literature that deals with race. After discussing the social conditions within which trust becomes relevant and outlining the distinctive contours of the three most common conceptualizations of trust—generalized, particularized, and strategic—I elaborate on the extent and nature of ethnoracial trust differences and provide an overview of the explanations for these differences. Ethnoracial differences in generalized trust are attributed to historical and contemporary discrimination, neighborhood context, and ethnoracial socialization. The consequences for the radius-of-trust problem are discussed with regard to particularized trust. And ethnoracial differences in strategic trust are located in structures of trustworthiness—such as social closure—and reputational concerns. I end the review with a brief discussion of social and economic consequences for trust gaps.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102526

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general, immigrants tend to trust others less than nonimmigrants.

    “The literature suggests that, in general, immigrants tend to trust others less than nonimmigrants (e.g., Smith 2010).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Smith 2010

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 160 · Cited by 254

Authors
Smith, S. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Sandra Susan
Venue
Annual Review of Sociology
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
453-475
ISSN
  • 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2115
OpenAlex
W2171944011
Cited by
254
References
160
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
generalized trust, particularized trust, strategic trust, social closure, reputational concerns, discrimination, neighborhood context, trustworthiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review