The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Forms of Work Organization
Abstract
A growing body of social science literature has examined the organizational innovations and staffing practices comprising new flexible forms of work. Researchers have investigated the depth and scope of these changes and questioned how they affect diverse groups of workers in the United States. Reviewing the research on this transformation reveals a model of combined and uneven flexibility, characterized by the opening of opportunities that are differentially distributed across different groups of American workers, emerging under conditions in which effort is intensified, control is decentered, and employment is destabilized. The essay concludes by suggesting additional areas of inquiry for sociologists concerned with new forms of work organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
Torraco, R. J. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305278283 · Cited by 3,534
Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400101 · Cited by 2,998
Nonstandard Employment Relations: Part-time, Temporary and Contract Work
Kalleberg, A. L. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.341 · Cited by 1,595
Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk
Irani, L. C., & Silberman, M. S. (2013) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2470742 · Cited by 798
Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine
Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240306800201 · Cited by 560
2 Old Assumptions, New Work: The Opportunities and Challenges of Research on Nonstandard Employment
Ashford, S. J., George, E., & Blatt, R. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/078559807 · Cited by 288
Laboring under Uncertainty: Identity Renegotiation among Contingent Workers
Padavic, I. (2005) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.2005.28.1.111 · Cited by 81
For better or worse? Workplace changes and the health and well-being of Norwegian workers
Østhus, S. (2007) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017007082881 · Cited by 61
New Technology and the Emerging Organizational Paradigm
Kolodny, H., Liu, M., Stynne, B., & Denis, H. (1996) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679604901201 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, V.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 315-339
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2168318626
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
