Cited by 288Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWork-Family Balance Challenges

2 Old Assumptions, New Work: The Opportunities and Challenges of Research on Nonstandard Employment

Ashford, Susan J., George, Elizabeth, Blatt, Ruth·2007·Academy of Management Annals

Abstract

We review the literature on nonstandard work with three aims: to portray the breadth and nature of the research and theorizing to date, to document the challenges and opportunities this domain poses to both practice and theory, and to bring the study of nonstandard work more to the center stage of micro-OB. After defining nonstandard work and documenting scholarly interest in it, we discuss the literature on the experience of nonstandard workers, on managing the nonstandard workforce, as well as that on managing the interface between standard and nonstandard workers. We analyze the themes that are raised in these literatures and point to new research questions that need to be addressed. Research on nonstandard work can enhance our understanding of the nature of work, the relationship between individuals and organizations, and how organizations and individuals can undertake these new work forms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/078559807

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on whether temporary and contingent workers engage in organizational citizenship behavior has mixed results.

    “Among the traditional types of gig workers such as temporary and contingent workers, researchers sought to understand whether they indeed engage in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB, cf.Ashford et al., 2007), with mixed results.”

    From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Ashford et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashford, S. J., George, E., & Blatt, R.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
Academy of Management Annals
Published
2007-12
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
65-117
ISSN
  • 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-6520
OpenAlex
W1602941406
Cited by
288
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
non-standard employment, employee experience, work organization, individual-organization relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review