The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Race and Race Theory
Abstract
Race has always been a significant sociological theme, from the founding of the field and the formulation of classical theoretical statements to the present. Since the nineteenth century, sociological perspectives on race have developed and changed, always reflecting shifts in large-scale political processes. In the classical period, colonialism and biologistic racism held sway. As the twentieth century dawned, sociology came to be dominated by US-based figures. DuBois and the Chicago School presented the first notable challenges to the field's racist assumptions. In the aftermath of World War II, with the destruction of European colonialism, the rise of the civil rights movement, and the surge in migration on a world scale, the sociology of race became a central topic. The field moved toward a more critical, more egalitarian awareness of race, focused particularly on the overcoming of prejudice and discrimination. Although the recognition of these problems increased and political reforms made some headway in combatting them, racial injustice and inequality were not surmounted. As the global and domestic politics of race entered a new period of crisis and uncertainty, so too has the field of sociology. To tackle the themes of race and racism once again in the new millennium, sociology must develop more effective racial theory. Racial formation approaches can offer a starting point here. The key tasks will be the formulation of a more adequate comparative historical sociology of race, the development of a deeper understanding of the micro-macro linkages that shape racial issues, and the recognition of the pervasiveness of racial politics in contemporary society. This is a challenging but also exciting agenda. The field must not shrink from addressing it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15881-2 · Cited by 3,981
Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement
Caldwell, V. F., & Crenshaw, K. W. (1996) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1123408 · Cited by 3,897
Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position
Blumer, H. (1958) · The Pacific Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/1388607 · Cited by 3,487
Cited by
Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control
Earl, J. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102609 · Cited by 445
Ethnicity, Race, and Nationalism
Brubaker, R. (2009) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115916 · Cited by 418
A Critical and Comprehensive Sociological Theory of Race and Racism
Golash-Boza, T. (2016) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649216632242 · Cited by 321
Tamayo-Sarver, J. H., Dawson, N. V., Hinze, S. W., Cydulka, R. K., Wigton, R. S., Albert, J. M., Ibrahim, S. A., & Baker, D. W. (2003) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00608.x · Cited by 126
Through a Glass Darkly: The Persistence of Race in Education Research & Scholarship
Ladson-Billings, G. (2012) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x12440743 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Winant, H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-185
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2160062079
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race and Race Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.169
- The paper
- Winant, H. (2000). Race and Race Theory. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.