Cited by 3,897Critical Race Theory in EducationRace, History, and American SocietyLaw, Rights, and Freedoms

Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement

Caldwell, Victor F., Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams·1996·Columbia Law Review

Abstract

Includes bibliographical references.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1123408

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caldwell, V. F., & Crenshaw, K. W.
Venue
Columbia Law Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-06
Volume
96
Issue
5
Pages
1363
ISSN
0010-1958 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1543971459
Cited by
3,897
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 230 · 2024: 274 · 2023: 243 · 2022: 296 · 2021: 312 · 2020: 244 · 2019: 257 · 2018: 182 · 2017: 189 · 2016: 184 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 148 · 2013: 151 · 2012: 145
FWCI
45.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Columbia Law Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Keywords
critical race theory, race and law, racial inequality, legal scholarship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review