The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Race, Gender, and Authority in the Workplace: Theory and Research
Abstract
▪ Abstract This chapter surveys sociological approaches to the study of job authority, including theoretical foundations, measurement, and emergence as an important dimension of social inequality. The focus here is mainly on studies of race and gender differences in the determinants of authority and the consequences of race and gender differences in authority for income. Despite significant advancements in the overall socioeconomic status of minorities and working women, race and gender remain important impediments to their attainment of authority. This pattern, which is consistent and robust in state-level, national, cross-national, and cross-temporal studies, is sustained net of an incumbent's human capital investments and structural location within and between several economic units. Following a review of the predominant explanations for gender and racial disparities in job authority is the conclusion that the most promising explanations for persistent racial and gender disparities in authority concern the racial and gender demography of the workplace and the tendency on the part of authority elites to reproduce themselves through both exclusionary and inclusionary processes. Suggestions for future research include additional delineation of these processes based on samples of multiple racial/ethnic groups of men and women and studies that synthesize quantitative and qualitative approaches to understanding the effects of employer and employee attitudes/preferences and practices on the authority attainment process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why Status Matters for Inequality
Ridgeway, C. L. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413515997 · Cited by 965
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000022 · Cited by 488
Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings
Leahey, E. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200403 · Cited by 356
What's in the “old boys” network? Accessing social capital in gendered and racialized networks
McDonald, S. (2011) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.002 · Cited by 304
The Nature of Work and the Stress of Higher Status
Schieman, S., Whitestone, Y. K., & Van Gundy, K. (2006) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650604700304 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 509-542
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2144365302
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race, Gender, and Authority in the Workplace: Theory and Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141048
- The paper
- Smith, R. A. (2002). Race, Gender, and Authority in the Workplace: Theory and Research. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.