The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging Theories of Care Work
Abstract
Care work is done in the home as well as in markets for pay. Five theoretical frameworks have been developed to conceptualize care work; the frameworks sometimes offer competing answers to the same questions, and other times address distinct questions. The “devaluation” perspective argues that care work is badly rewarded because care is associated with women, and often women of color. The “public good” framework points out that care work provides benefits far beyond those to the direct recipient and suggests that the low pay of care work is a special case of the failure of markets to reward public goods. The “prisoner of love” framework argues that the intrinsic caring motives of care workers allow employers to more easily get away with paying care workers less. Instead of seeing the emotional satisfactions of giving care as its own reward, the “commodification of emotion” framework focuses on emotional harm to workers when they have to sell services that use an intimate part of themselves. The “love and money” framework argues against dichotomous views in which markets are seen as antithetical to true care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176
Cited by
Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/595942 · Cited by 996
The Sociology of Emotional Labor
Wharton, A. S. (2009) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115944 · Cited by 801
Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?
England, P., Bearak, J., Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2016) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122416673598 · Cited by 365
Self-citationFew‐Demo, A. L. (2014) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/jftr.12039 · Cited by 279
Barone, C. (2011) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/0038040711402099 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- England, P.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-08-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 381-399
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2145123869
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging Theories of Care Work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122317
- The paper
- England, P. (2005). Emerging Theories of Care Work. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.