The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intersectionality as the “New” Critical Approach in Feminist Family Studies: Evolving Racial/Ethnic Feminisms and Critical Race Theories
Abstract
This article presents one of the first comprehensive reviews of intersectionality literature for a family studies audience. The purpose of this article is manifold: (1) to review the interdisciplinary scholarship on intersectionality as a theoretical approach, paradigm, or method; (2) to review methodological considerations using intersectionality as a theoretical guide to conduct research; and (3) to examine how contemporary family scholars are utilizing an intersectional approach to examine the complexities of identity, relational process, and social interactions with larger institutional forces. I conclude with an evaluation of the benefits and challenges of using an intersectional approach to the study of contemporary families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
Bohm, D., & Kuhn, T. S. (1964) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217783 · Cited by 9,130
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682
This bridge called my back : writings by radical women of color
Moraga, C. L., & ANZALDÚA, G. E. (2015) · Cited by 4,964
Unequal childhoods: class, race, and family life
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4975 · Cited by 4,619
The science question in feminism
Waters, K. (1987) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/0277-5395(87)90077-x · Cited by 3,804
Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America
Quijano, A. (2000) · International Sociology · doi:10.1177/0268580900015002005 · Cited by 3,190
Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action
Bowen, J. R. (1999) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1999.101.4.876 · Cited by 2,835
Intersectionality and research in psychology
Cole, E. R. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0014564 · Cited by 2,722
Cited by
Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research
Abrams, J. A., Tabaac, A., Jung, S., & Else-Quest, N. M. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Few‐Demo, A. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Family Theory & Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-183
- ISSN
- 1756-2570 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-2589
- OpenAlex
- W1514819027
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 31.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intersectionality as the “New” Critical Approach in Feminist Family Studies: Evolving Racial/Ethnic Feminisms and Critical Race Theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jftr.12039
- The paper
- Few‐Demo, A. L. (2014). Intersectionality as the “New” Critical Approach in Feminist Family Studies: Evolving Racial/Ethnic Feminisms and Critical Race Theories. Journal of Family Theory & Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
