The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cursive Script Recognition by Elastic Matching
Abstract
Dynamic programming has been found useful for performing nonlinear time warping for matching patterns in automatic speech recognition. Here, this technique is applied to the problem of recognizing cursive script. The parameters used in the matching are derived from time sequences of x-y coordinate data of words handwritten on an electronic tablet. Chosen for their properties of invariance with respect to size and translation of the writing, these parameters are found particularly suitable for the elastic matching technique. A salient feature of the recognition system is the establishment, in a training procedure, of prototypes by each writer using the system. In this manner, the system is tailored to the user. Processing is performed on a word-by-word basis after the writing is separated into words. Using prototypes for each letter, the matching procedure allows any letter to follow any letter and finds the letter sequence which best fits the unknown word. A major advantage of this procedure is that it combines letter segmentation and recognition in one operation by, in essence, evaluating recognition at all possible segmentations, thus avoiding the usual segmentation-then-recognition philosophy. Results on cursive writing are presented where the alphabet is restricted to the lower-case letters. Letter recognition accuracy is over 95 percent for each of three writers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Funkhouser, T., Min, P., Kazhdan, M., Chen, J., Halderman, A., Dobkin, D., & Jacobs, D. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/588272.588279 · Cited by 935
The state of the art in online handwriting recognition
Tappert, C. C., Suen, C. Y., & Wakahara, T. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.57669 · Cited by 857
Self-citationOff-line cursive script word recognition
Bozinovic, R. M., & Srihari, S. N. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.23114 · Cited by 455
SHARK 2: a large vocabulary shorthand writing system for pen-based computers
Kristensson, P.-O., & Zhai, S. (2004) · Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/1029632.1029640 · Cited by 419
Shorthand writing on stylus keyboard
Zhai, S., & Kristensson, P.-O. (2003) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/642611.642630 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Tappert, C. C.
- Venue
- IBM Journal of Research and Development
- Publisher
- IBM
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 765-771
- ISSN
- 0018-8646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117072511
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cursive Script Recognition by Elastic Matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1147/rd.266.0765
- The paper
- Tappert, C. C. (1982). Cursive Script Recognition by Elastic Matching. IBM Journal of Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.266.0765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.