The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is measured when you measure a resistance?—The Landauer formula revisited
Abstract
We re-examine the question of what constitutes the physically relevant quantum-mechanical expression for the resistance of a disordered conductor in light of recent experimental and theoretical advances in our understanding of the conducting properties of mesoscopic systems. It is shown that in the absence of a magnetic field, the formula proposed by Büttiker, which expresses the current response of a multi-port conductor in terms of transmission matrices, is derivable straightforwardly from linear response theory. We also present a general formalism for solving these equations for the resistance given the scattering matrix. This Landauer-type formula reduces to g=(e2/h)Tr(tt†), where g is the conductance and t is the transmission matrix, for the two-probe case. It is suggested that this formula provides the best description of the present class of experiments performed in two-probe or multi-probe measuring configurations, and that the subtleties leading to various different Landauer formulae are not relevant to these experiments. This is not because of the large number of channels in real conductors, but is due to the fact that apparently no present experiment probes a “local chemical potential” in the conductor. Certain standard objections to deriving a Landauer-type formula from linear response theory are answered. Applications of this formula to fluctuations in disordered multi-probe conductors are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Universal Conductance Fluctuations in Metals
Lee, P. A., & Stone, A. D. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.1622 · Cited by 1,369
Self-citation
Cited by
Random-matrix theory of quantum transport
Beenakker, C. W. J. (1997) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.69.731 · Cited by 2,551
Absence of backscattering in the quantum Hall effect in multiprobe conductors
Büttiker, M. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.38.9375 · Cited by 1,555
Theory of Quantum Conduction through a Constriction
Szafer, A., & Stone, A. D. (1989) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.300 · Cited by 447
Self-citationConductance determined by transmission: probes and quantised constriction resistance
Landauer, R. (1989) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/1/43/011 · Cited by 444
Coherent and collective quantum optical effects in mesoscopic systems
Brandes, T. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.12.002 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, A. D., & Szafer, A.
- Venue
- IBM Journal of Research and Development
- Publisher
- IBM
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 384-413
- ISSN
- 0018-8646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068275350
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is measured when you measure a resistance?—The Landauer formula revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1147/rd.323.0384
- The paper
- Stone, A. D., & Szafer, A. (1988). What is measured when you measure a resistance?—The Landauer formula revisited. IBM Journal of Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.323.0384
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.