Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Phenomenon of Reoxygenation and Its Implications for Fractionated Radiotherapy

Kallman, Robert F.·1972·Radiology

Abstract

The radiobiological oxygen effect is critical in radiotherapy, as all experimental tumors that have been tested contain large proportions (approximately 1–50%) of severely hypoxic cells, and many human tumors are partially hypoxic on histopathological grounds. In designing fractionated dose regimens, it is essential to recognize the special importance of the reoxygenation of preferentially surviving hypoxic cells. Most animal tumors have been shown to reoxygenate rapidly enough that the hypoxic fraction is restored to the preirradiated level within approximately 24 hours. Different tumors may reoxygenate at different rates. It is presently impossible to identify the mechanism(s) responsible for reoxygenation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/105.1.135

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Kallman, R. F.
Venue
Radiology
Published
1972-10
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
135-142
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2031307716
Cited by
294
References
0
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Phenomenon of Reoxygenation and Its Implications for Fractionated Radiotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/105.1.135
The paper
Kallman, R. F. (1972). The Phenomenon of Reoxygenation and Its Implications for Fractionated Radiotherapy. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/105.1.135

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.