The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiation dose in CT.
Abstract
The energy deposited in the patient by the rotating x-ray beam in computed tomography produces more uniform absorbed dose values within the section of imaged tissue than those produced in conventional radiologic procedures. The dose values within a specific section are determined by factors such as voltage, current, scan time, scan field, rotation angle, filtration, collimation, and section thickness and spacing. For routine dose determinations, a pencil ionization chamber is usually employed with a plastic phantom. Dose for a specific patient can be determined with thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on the patient. Multiple-scan procedures normally increase the dose in a specific section by less than a factor of two. Typical multiple-scan average doses are in the range of 40-60 mGy for head scans and 10-40 mGy for body scans. Integral dose, however, is directly proportional to the number of sections in an examination. When examination factors are changed to reduce dose, the image noise increases. An optimum protocol is one that results in a balance between dose and image quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology
HALL, E. J., & BRENNER, D. J. (2008) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr/01948454 · Cited by 915
Strategies for Reducing Radiation Dose in CT
McCollough, C. H., Primak, A. N., Braun, N., Kofler, J., Yu, L., & Christner, J. (2009) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006 · Cited by 842
Radiation Exposure from Musculoskeletal Computerized Tomographic Scans
Biswas, D., Bible, J. E., Bohan, M., Simpson, A. K., Whang, P. G., & Grauer, J. N. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.h.01199 · Cited by 441
Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients?
Paterson, A., Frush, D. P., & Donnelly, L. F. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760297 · Cited by 422
Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies
Gies, M., Kalender, W. A., Wolf, H., Suess, C., & Madsen, M. T. (1999) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598779 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothenberg, L. N., & Pentlow, K. S.
- Venue
- RadioGraphics
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1225-1243
- ISSN
- 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2144636812
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation dose in CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiographics.12.6.1439023
- The paper
- Rothenberg, L. N., & Pentlow, K. S. (1992). Radiation dose in CT. RadioGraphics. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.12.6.1439023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.