The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies
Abstract
Tube current modulation governed by x-ray attenuation during CT (computed tomography) acquisition can lead to noise reduction which in turn can be used to achieve patient dose reduction without loss in image quality. The potential of this technique was investigated in simulation studies calculating both noise amplitude levels and noise distribution in CT images. The dependence of noise on the inodulation function, amplitude of modulation, shape and size of the object, and possible phase shift between attenuation and modulation function were examined. Both sinusoidal and attenuation-based control functions were used to modulate tube current. Noise reduction was calculated for both ideal systems and for real systems with limited modulation amplitude. Dose reductions up to 50% can be achieved depending on the phantom geometry and tube current modulation function. Attenuation-based tube current modulation yields substantially higher reduction than fixed-shape modulation functions. Optimal results are obtained when the current is modulated as a function of the square root of attenuation. A modulation amplitude of at least 90% should be available to exploit the potential of these techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rothenberg, L. N., & Pentlow, K. S. (1992) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/radiographics.12.6.1439023 · Cited by 192
Haaga, J. R., Miraldi, F. D., MacIntyre, W. J., Lipuma, J. P., Bryan, P. J., & Wiesen, E. (1981) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.138.2.7455129 · Cited by 107
Radiation dose reduction in CT of the pediatric pelvis.
Kamel, I. R., Hernandez, R. J., Martin, J. E., Schlesinger, A. E., Niklason, L. T., & Guire, K. E. (1994) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115611 · Cited by 68
Cited by
Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization
Kalra, M. K., Maher, M. M., Toth, T. L., Hamberg, L. M., Blake, M. A., Shepard, J.-A., & Saini, S. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2303021726 · Cited by 1,080
Strategies for Reducing Radiation Dose in CT
McCollough, C. H., Primak, A. N., Braun, N., Kofler, J., Yu, L., & Christner, J. (2009) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006 · Cited by 842
Bluemke, D. A., Achenbach, S., Budoff, M., Gerber, T. C., Gersh, B., Hillis, L. D., Hundley, W. G., Manning, W. J., Printz, B. F., Stuber, M., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.189695 · Cited by 461
Radiation Dose Modulation Techniques in the Multidetector CT Era: From Basics to Practice
Lee, C. H., Goo, J. M., Ye, H. J., Ye, S.-J., Park, C. M., Chun, E. J., & Im, J.-G. (2008) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.285075075 · Cited by 314
Kachelrieß, M., Watzke, O., & Kalender, W. A. (2001) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1358303 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gies, M., Kalender, W. A., Wolf, H., Suess, C., & Madsen, M. T.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2235-2247
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015892377
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.598779
- The paper
- Gies, M., Kalender, W. A., Wolf, H., Suess, C., & Madsen, M. T. (1999). Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598779
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.