Cited by 103Medical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Abdominal Masses Sampled at PET/CT-guided Percutaneous Biopsy: Initial Experience with Registration of Prior PET/CT Images

Tatli, Servet, Gerbaudo, Victor H., Mamede, Marcelo, Tuncali, Kemal, Shyn, Paul B., Silverman, Stuart G.·2010·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish the feasibility of performing combined positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy of abdominal masses by using previously acquired PET/CT images registered with intraprocedural CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved study, 14 patients underwent clinically indicated percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses (mean size, 3.3 cm; range, 1.2-5.0 cm) in the liver (n = 6), presacral soft tissue (n = 3), retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 2), spleen (n = 2), and pancreas (n = 1). PET/CT images obtained no more than 62 days (mean, 18.3 days) before the biopsy procedure were registered with intraprocedural CT images by using image registration software. The registered images were used to plan the procedure and help target the masses. RESULTS: The image registrations were technically successful in all but one patient, who had severe scoliosis. The remaining 13 biopsy procedures yielded diagnostic results, which were positive for malignancy in 10 cases and negative in three cases. CONCLUSION: PET/CT-guided abdominal biopsy with use of prior PET/CT images registered with intraprocedural CT scans is feasible and may be helpful when fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose-avid masses that are not seen sufficiently with nonenhanced CT are sampled at biopsy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.10090931

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PET overlay of functional information on CT or MR images has been shown to better guide biopsies in the abdomen and in patients with bone disease.

    “This has already been shown with the use of PET to overlay functional information on CT or MR images to better guide biopsies in the abdomen and in patients with bone disease (60,61).”

    From Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data (2016) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tatli, S., Gerbaudo, V. H., Mamede, M., Tuncali, K., Shyn, P. B., & Silverman, S. G.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2010-07
Volume
256
Issue
1
Pages
305-311
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2158893731
Cited by
103
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
PET/CT-guided biopsy, abdominal mass, image registration, percutaneous biopsy, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, liver mass, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, splenic mass, scoliosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Digestive System Neoplasms, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Radiography, Interventional, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review