Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: CT Texture as a Predictive Biomarker

Open access
Goh, Vicky, Ganeshan, Balaji, Nathan, Paul, Juttla, Jaspal K., Vinayan, Anup, Miles, Kenneth A.·2011·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess changes in tumor computed tomographic (CT) texture after two cycles of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and to determine if tumor texture correlates with measured time to progression in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer who received TKIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A waiver of institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective analysis. Contrast material-enhanced CT texture parameters were assessed in 39 patients with metastatic renal cell cancer who received a TKI. A total of 87 metastases were analyzed at baseline and after two treatment cycles. Changes in tumor entropy and uniformity were derived with a software algorithm that selectively filters and extracts texture at different scales (fine to coarse detail: 1.0-2.5) and were recorded. Response assessment was also obtained by using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), as well as Choi and modified Choi criteria. The correlation of texture parameters and standard criteria with measured time to progression was assessed by using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression model. Statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: Tumor entropy decreased by 3%-45% and uniformity increased by 5%-21% for the different scale values after administration of a TKI. With a threshold change of -2% or less for uniformity at a coarse scale value of 2.5, Kaplan-Meier curves of the proportion of patients without disease progression were significantly different and better than those for standard response assessment (P = .008 vs P = .267, P = .053, and P = .042 for RECIST, Choi, and modified Choi criteria, respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that texture uniformity was an independent predictor of time to progression (odds ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.52, 10.65; P = .005). CONCLUSION: CT texture analysis reflecting tumor heterogeneity is an independent factor associated with time to progression and has potential as a predictive imaging biomarker of response of metastatic renal cancer to targeted therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.11110264

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Goh, V., Ganeshan, B., Nathan, P., Juttla, J. K., Vinayan, A., & Miles, K. A.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2011-10
Volume
261
Issue
1
Pages
165-171
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2017837130
Cited by
367
References
1
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: CT Texture as a Predictive Biomarker. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.11110264
The paper
Goh, V., Ganeshan, B., Nathan, P., Juttla, J. K., Vinayan, A., & Miles, K. A. (2011). Assessment of Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: CT Texture as a Predictive Biomarker. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.