The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Revised Atlanta Classification of Acute Pancreatitis: Its Importance for the Radiologist and Its Effect on Treatment
Abstract
An international working group has modified the Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis to update the terminology and provide simple functional clinical and morphologic classifications. The modifications (a) address the clinical course and severity of disease, (b) divide acute pancreatitis into interstitial edematous pancreatitis and necrotizing pancreatitis, (c) distinguish an early phase (1st week) and a late phase (after the 1st week), and (d) emphasize systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multisystem organ failure. In the 1st week, only clinical parameters are important for treatment planning. After the 1st week, morphologic criteria defined on the basis of computed tomographic findings are combined with clinical parameters to help determine care. This revised classification introduces new terminology for pancreatic fluid collections. Depending on presence or absence of necrosis, acute collections in the first 4 weeks are called acute necrotic collections or acute peripancreatic fluid collections. Once an enhancing capsule develops, persistent acute peripancreatic fluid collections are referred to as pseudocysts; and acute necrotic collections, as walled-off necroses. All can be sterile or infected. Terms such as pancreatic abscess and intrapancreatic pseudocyst have been abandoned. The goal is for radiologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and pathologists to use the revised classifications to standardize imaging terminology to facilitate treatment planning and enable precise comparison of results among different departments and institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradley, E. L. (1993) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170122019 · Cited by 2,756
Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score: A reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome
Marshall, J. C., Cook, D. J., Christou, N. V., Bernard, G. R., Sprung, C. L., & Sibbald, W. J. (1995) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199510000-00007 · Cited by 2,532
Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis
Banks, P. A., Freeman, M. L., & the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x · Cited by 2,050
A Step-up Approach or Open Necrosectomy for Necrotizing Pancreatitis
van Santvoort, H. C., Besselink, M. G., Bakker, O. J., Hofker, H. S., Boermeester, M. A., Dejong, C. H., van Goor, H., Schaapherder, A. F., van Eijck, C. H., Bollen, T. L., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0908821 · Cited by 1,699
Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis.
Balthazar, E. J., Robinson, D. L., Megibow, A. J., & Ranson, J. H. (1990) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296641 · Cited by 1,696
(2012) · Hepatogastroenterology · doi:10.5754/hge12183 · Cited by 1,625
Acute Pancreatitis: Assessment of Severity with Clinical and CT Evaluation
Balthazar, E. J. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2233010680 · Cited by 859
Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Treatment Strategy According to the Status of Infection
Büchler, M. W., Gloor, B., Müller, C. A., Friess, H., Seiler, C. A., & Uhl, W. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200011000-00001 · Cited by 811
Whitcomb, D. C. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp054958 · Cited by 745
Windsor, A. C. J., Kanwar, S., Li, A. G. K., Barnes, E., Guthrie, J. A., Spark, J. I., Welsh, F., Guillou, P. J., & Reynolds, J. V. (1998) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.42.3.431 · Cited by 684
Cited by
Banks, P. A., Bollen, T. L., Dervenis, C., Gooszen, H. G., Johnson, C. D., Sarr, M. G., Tsiotos, G. G., & Vege, S. S. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779 · Cited by 7,187
Metadata
- Authors
- Thoeni, R. F.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 262
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 751-764
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2149807907
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 30.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Revised Atlanta Classification of Acute Pancreatitis: Its Importance for the Radiologist and Its Effect on Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.11110947
- The paper
- Thoeni, R. F. (2012). The Revised Atlanta Classification of Acute Pancreatitis: Its Importance for the Radiologist and Its Effect on Treatment. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.