Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Achieving Routine Submillisievert CT Scanning: Report from the Summit on Management of Radiation Dose in CT

Open access
McCollough, Cynthia H., Chen, Guang Hong, Kalender, Willi, Leng, Shuai, Samei, Ehsan, Taguchi, Katsuyuki, Wang, Ge, Yu, Lifeng, Pettigrew, Roderic I.·2012·Radiology

Abstract

This Special Report presents the consensus of the Summit on Management of Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography (CT) (held in February 2011), which brought together participants from academia, clinical practice, industry, and regulatory and funding agencies to identify the steps required to reduce the effective dose from routine CT examinations to less than 1 mSv. The most promising technologies and methods discussed at the summit include innovations and developments in x-ray sources; detectors; and image reconstruction, noise reduction, and postprocessing algorithms. Access to raw projection data and standard data sets for algorithm validation and optimization is a clear need, as is the need for new, clinically relevant metrics of image quality and diagnostic performance. Current commercially available techniques such as automatic exposure control, optimization of tube potential, beam-shaping filters, and dynamic z-axis collimators are important, and education to successfully implement these methods routinely is critically needed. Other methods that are just becoming widely available, such as iterative reconstruction, noise reduction, and postprocessing algorithms, will also have an important role. Together, these existing techniques can reduce dose by a factor of two to four. Technical advances that show considerable promise for additional dose reduction but are several years or more from commercial availability include compressed sensing, volume of interest and interior tomography techniques, and photon-counting detectors. This report offers a strategic roadmap for the CT user and research and manufacturer communities toward routinely achieving effective doses of less than 1 mSv, which is well below the average annual dose from naturally occurring sources of radiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.12112265

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
McCollough, C. H., Chen, G. H., Kalender, W., Leng, S., Samei, E., Taguchi, K., Wang, G., Yu, L., & Pettigrew, R. I.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2012-08
Volume
264
Issue
2
Pages
567-580
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2142008745
Cited by
276
References
1
FWCI
27.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving Routine Submillisievert CT Scanning: Report from the Summit on Management of Radiation Dose in CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.12112265
The paper
McCollough, C. H., Chen, G. H., Kalender, W., Leng, S., Samei, E., Taguchi, K., Wang, G., Yu, L., & Pettigrew, R. I. (2012). Achieving Routine Submillisievert CT Scanning: Report from the Summit on Management of Radiation Dose in CT. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112265

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.