The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pericardial Disease: Value of CT and MR Imaging
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The pericardium represents an important focus of morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. Fortunately, in recent years knowledge regarding this enigmatic part of the heart and the diagnosis of related diseases has substantially advanced. To a large extent, this can be attributed to the availability of several noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities. Transthoracic echocardiography, which combines structural and physiologic assessment, is the first-line technique for examination of patients suspected of having or known to have pericardial disease; however, cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are becoming increasingly popular for the study of this part of the heart. Modern multidetector CT scanners merge acquisition speed and high spatial and contrast resolution, with volumetric scanning to provide excellent anatomic detail of the pericardium. Multidetector CT is by far the modality of choice for depiction of pericardial calcifications. MR imaging is probably the best imaging modality for the acquisition of a comprehensive view of the pericardial abnormalities. MR imaging combines cardiac and pericardial anatomic assessment with tissue characterization and appraisal of the effects of pericardial abnormalities on cardiac performance. This review aims to elucidate the role of the pericardium and its interaction with the remainder of the heart in normal and pathologic conditions. It focuses on the rapidly evolving insights regarding pericardial disease provided by modern imaging modalities, not infrequently necessitating reconsideration of evidence that has thus far been taken for granted. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.13121059/-/DC1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epicardial adipose tissue: Anatomic, biomolecular and clinical relationships with the heart
Iacobellis, G., Corradi, D., & Sharma, A. M. (2005) · Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1038/ncpcardio0319 · Cited by 1,015
Cited by
2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases
Adler, Y., Charron, P., Imazio, M., Badano, L., Barón-Esquivias, G., Bogaert, J., Brucato, A., Gueret, P., Klingel, K., Lionis, C., et al. (2015) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv318 · Cited by 2,634
Self-citationKlein, A. L., Abbara, S., Agler, D. A., Appleton, C. P., Asher, C. R., Hoit, B., Hung, J., Garcia, M. J., Kronzon, I., Oh, J. K., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2013.06.023 · Cited by 773
SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Leiner, T., Bogaert, J., Friedrich, M. G., Mohiaddin, R., Muthurangu, V., Myerson, S., Powell, A. J., Raman, S. V., & Pennell, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1186/s12968-020-00682-4 · Cited by 328
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bogaert, J., & Francone, M.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 340-356
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2167239413
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pericardial Disease: Value of CT and MR Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.13121059
- The paper
- Bogaert, J., & Francone, M. (2013). Pericardial Disease: Value of CT and MR Imaging. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.