Cited by 7Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisMRI in cancer diagnosisMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison with the Liver Parenchyma and Correlation with the Survival of Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2017174012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, B.-B., Hsu, C.-Y., Yu, C.-W., Liang, P.-C., Hsu, C., Hsu, C.-H., Cheng, A.-L., & Ting-Fang Shih, T.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2017-06
Volume
283
Issue
3
Pages
923-923
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W4231176032
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Radiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, liver parenchyma, patient survival, systemic therapy, treatment response, advanced liver cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review