Blood-Brain Barrier Opening with MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound Elicits Meningeal Venous Permeability in Humans with Early Alzheimer Disease
Open accessAbstract
Background Opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) induced with MRI-guided focused ultrasound has been shown in experimental animal models to reduce amyloid-β plaque burden, improve memory performance, and facilitate delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain. However, physiologic effects of this procedure in humans with Alzheimer disease (AD) require further investigation. Purpose To assess imaging effects of focused ultrasound–induced BBB opening in the hippocampus of human participants with early AD and to evaluate fluid flow patterns after BBB opening by using serial contrast-enhanced MRI. Materials and Methods Study participants with early AD recruited to a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant, prospective, ongoing phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03671889) underwent three separate focused ultrasound–induced BBB opening procedures that used a 220-kHz transducer with a concomitant intravenous microbubble contrast agent administered at 2-week intervals targeting the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex between October 2018 and May 2019. Posttreatment effects and gadolinium-based contrast agent enhancement patterns were evaluated by using 3.0-T MRI. Results Three women (aged 61, 72, and 73 years) consecutively enrolled in the trial successfully completed repeated focused ultrasound–induced BBB opening of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Postprocedure contrast enhancement was clearly identified within the targeted brain volumes, indicating immediate spatially precise BBB opening. Parenchymal enhancement resolved within 24 hours after all treatments, confirming BBB closure. Transient perivenous enhancement was consistently observed during the acute phase after BBB opening. Notably, contrast enhancement reappeared in the perivenular regions after BBB closure. This imaging marker is consistent with blood-meningeal barrier permeability and persisted for 24–48 hours before spontaneous resolution. No evidence of intracranial hemorrhage or other adverse effect was identified. Conclusion MRI-guided focused ultrasound–induced blood-brain barrier opening was safely performed in the hippocampi of three participants with Alzheimer disease without any adverse effects. Posttreatment MRI reveals a unique spatiotemporal contrast enhancement pattern that suggests a perivenular immunologic healing response downstream from targeted sites. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Klibanov in this issue.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Iliff, J. J., Wang, M., Liao, Y., Plogg, B. A., Peng, W., Gundersen, G. A., Benveniste, H., Vates, G. E., Deane, R., Goldman, S. A., et al. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 · Cited by 5,824 · see citing works
Brain-wide glymphatic enhancement and clearance in humans assessed with MRI.
Ringstad, G., Valnes, L. M., Dale, A. M., Pripp, A. H., Vatnehol, S.-A. S., Emblem, K. E., Mardal, K.-A., & Eide, P. K. (2018) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.121537 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Perivascular spaces, glymphatic dysfunction, and small vessel disease
Mestre, H., Kostrikov, S., Mehta, R. I., & Nedergaard, M. (2017) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20160381 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Self-citationBurgess, A., Dubey, S., Yeung, S., Hough, O., Eterman, N., Aubert, I., & Hynynen, K. (2014) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.14140245 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Real-Time In Vivo Imaging Reveals the Ability of Monocytes to Clear Vascular Amyloid Beta
Michaud, J.-P., Bellavance, M.-A., Préfontaine, P., & Rivest, S. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.010 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Glymphatics visualization after focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in humans
Meng, Y., Abrahao, A., Heyn, C. C., Bethune, A. J., Huang, Y., Pople, C. B., Aubert, I., Hamani, C., Zinman, L., Hynynen, K., et al. (2019) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25604 · Cited by 114 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Our interpretation of this imaging phenomenon, which differs from the analysis of Meng et al (18), is supported with posttreatment MRI data obtained from all three study participants.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges and hopes for Alzheimer’s disease
Tatulian, S. A. (2022) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2022.01.016 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Dysfunction of the blood–brain barrier in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from human studies
Kurz, C., Walker, L., Rauchmann, B., & Perneczky, R. (2022) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/nan.12782 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“sonication of the hippocampus, contrast enhancement along the course of draining veins in the hippocampus(94) and perivenous enhancement towards the dural venous sinuses(95) were interpreted as glymphatic efflux.(94) The enhanced drainage along veins does not affect CAA, which mainly occurs along arteries.”
Background
- Authors
- Mehta, R. I., Carpenter, J. S., Mehta, R. I., Haut, M. W., Ranjan, M., Najib, U., Lockman, P., Wang, P., D’haese, P.-F., & Rezai, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- West Virginia University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 654-662
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- PMC
- PMC7924515
- OpenAlex
- W3120769833
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5U54GM104942-04)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K08NS089830)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- blood-brain barrier opening, MR-guided focused ultrasound, Alzheimer's disease, early Alzheimer's disease, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, microbubbles
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Blood-Brain Barrier, Contrast Media, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonic Therapy, Drug Delivery Systems, Entorhinal Cortex, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review