Cited by 75Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detection

Machine Learning-Based Differentiation of Benign and Premalignant Colorectal Polyps Detected with CT Colonography in an Asymptomatic Screening Population: A Proof-Of-Concept Study

Grosu, Sergio, Wesp, Philipp, Graser, Anno, Maurus, Stefan, Schulz, Christian, Knösel, Thomas, Cyran, Clemens C., Ricke, Jens +2 more·2021·Radiology

Abstract

Background CT colonography does not enable definite differentiation between benign and premalignant colorectal polyps. Purpose To perform machine learning–based differentiation of benign and premalignant colorectal polyps detected with CT colonography in an average-risk asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening sample with external validation using radiomics. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective trial, colorectal polyps of all size categories and morphologies were manually segmented on CT colonographic images and were classified as benign (hyperplastic polyp or regular mucosa) or premalignant (adenoma) according to the histopathologic reference standard. Quantitative image features characterizing shape (n = 14), gray level histogram statistics (n = 18), and image texture (n = 68) were extracted from segmentations after applying 22 image filters, resulting in 1906 feature-filter combinations. Based on these features, a random forest classification algorithm was trained to predict the individual polyp character. Diagnostic performance was validated in an external test set. Results The random forest model was fitted using a training set consisting of 107 colorectal polyps in 63 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 8 [standard deviation]; 40 men) comprising 169 segmentations on CT colonographic images. The external test set included 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 segmentations. Random forest analysis yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.96), a sensitivity of 82% (65 of 79) (95% CI: 74%, 91%), and a specificity of 85% (33 of 39) (95% CI: 72%, 95%) in the external test set. In two subgroup analyses of the external test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 in the size category of 6–9 mm and 0.90 in the size category of 10 mm or larger. The most important image feature for decision making (relative importance of 3.7%) was quantifying first-order gray level histogram statistics. Conclusion In this proof-of-concept study, machine learning–based image analysis enabled noninvasive differentiation of benign and premalignant colorectal polyps with CT colonography. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2021202363

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiology is one step ahead and shows what is possible with the emerging field of radiomics-the extraction of data from radiograms to diagnose cancer, predict outcomes or guide therapy.

    “Radiology is one step ahead and shows what is possible with the emerging field of radiomics—the extraction of data from radiograms to diagnose cancer, predict outcomes or guide therapy (54–56).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grosu, S., Wesp, P., Graser, A., Maurus, S., Schulz, C., Knösel, T., Cyran, C. C., Ricke, J., Ingrisch, M., & Kazmierczak, P. M.
Affiliations
LMU Klinikum (DE)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2021-05
Volume
299
Issue
2
Pages
326-335
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W3131887757
Cited by
75
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
colorectal polyps, CT colonography, radiomics, colorectal adenoma, hyperplastic polyps, random forest classification, image texture features, polyp size, colorectal cancer screening, non-invasive diagnosis, external validation, image segmentation, image filters, polyp morphology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Proof of Concept Study, Aged, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Contrast Media, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Precancerous Conditions, Prospective Studies, Colonography, Computed Tomographic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review