The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of breast computed tomography (CT) in terms of radiation dose and image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Validated Monte Carlo simulation techniques were used to estimate the average glandular dose (AGD). The calculated photon fluence at the detector for high-quality abdominal CT (120 kVp, 300 mAs, 5-mm section thickness) was the benchmark for assessing the milliampere seconds and corresponding radiation dose necessary for breast CT. Image noise was measured by using a 10-cm-diameter cylinder imaged with a clinical CT scanner at 10-300 mAs for 80, 100, and 120 kVp. A cadaveric breast was imaged in the coronal plane to approximate the acquisition geometry of a proposed breast CT scanner. RESULTS: The AGD for 80-kVp breast CT was comparable to that for two-view mammography of 5-cm breasts (compressed breast thickness). For thicker breasts, the breast CT dose was about one-third less than that for two-view mammography. The maximum dose at mammography assessed in 1-mm(3) voxels was far higher (20.0 mGy) than that at breast CT (5.4 mGy) for a typical 5-cm 50% glandular breast. CT images of an 8-cm cadaveric breast (AGD, 6.3 mGy) were subjectively superior to digital mammograms (AGD, 10.1 mGy) of the same specimen. CONCLUSION: The potential of high signal-to-noise ratio images with low anatomic noise, which are obtainable at dose levels comparable to those for mammography, suggests that dedicated breast CT should be studied further for its potential in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sidky, E. Y., & Pan, X. (2008) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 · Cited by 1,995
Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience
Lindfors, K. K., Boone, J. M., Nelson, T. R., Yang, K., Kwan, A. L. C., & Miller, D. F. (2008) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070410 · Cited by 351
Self-citationGiger, M. L., Chan, H., & Boone, J. (2008) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3013555 · Cited by 311
Self-citationFlat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT)
Kalender, W. A., & Kyriakou, Y. (2007) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0651-9 · Cited by 302
Sisniega, A., Zbijewski, W., Badal, A., Kyprianou, I. S., Stayman, J. W., Vaquero, J. J., & Siewerdsen, J. H. (2013) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.4801895 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Boone, J. M., Nelson, T. R., Lindfors, K. K., & Seibert, J. A.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 221
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 657-667
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2123683167
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2213010334
- The paper
- Boone, J. M., Nelson, T. R., Lindfors, K. K., & Seibert, J. A. (2001). Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2213010334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.