Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Painful Metastases Involving Bone: Feasibility of Percutaneous CT- and US-guided Radio-frequency Ablation

Callstrom, Matthew R., Charboneau, J. William, Goetz, Matthew P., Rubin, Joseph, Wong, Gilbert Y., Sloan, Jeff A., Novotny, Paul J., Lewis, Bradley D., Welch, Timothy J., Farrell, Michael A., Maus, Timothy P., Lee, Robert A., Reading, Carl C., Petersen, Ivy A., Pickett, Deitra D.·2002·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of radio-frequency (RF) ablation for pain reduction, quality of life improvement, and analgesics use reduction in patients with skeletal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 10 months, 12 adult patients with a single painful osteolytic metastasis in whom radiation therapy or chemotherapy had failed and who reported severe pain (pain score > or = 4 [scale of 0-10]) over a 24-hour period were treated with percutaneous imaging-guided RF ablation with a multi-tined electrode while under general anesthesia. Patient pain was measured with a Brief Pain Inventory 1 day after the procedure, every week for 1 month, and thereafter every other week (total follow-up, 6 months). Patient analgesics use was also recorded at these follow-up intervals. Follow-up contrast material-enhanced computed tomography was performed 1 week after the procedure. Complications were monitored. Analysis of the primary end point was undertaken with paired comparison procedures. RESULTS: Lesion size was 1-11 cm. Before RF ablation, mean worst pain score in a 24-hour period in 12 patients was 8.0 (range, 6-10). At 4 weeks after treatment, mean worst pain decreased to 3.1 (P =.001). Mean pain before treatment was 6.5 and decreased to 1.8 (P <.001) 4 weeks after treatment. Mean pain interference in general activity decreased from 6.6 to 2.7 (P =.002) 4 weeks after treatment. Eight of 10 patients using analgesics reported reduced use at some time after RF ablation. No serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: RF ablation of painful osteolytic metastases is safe, and the relief of pain is substantial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2241011613

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Callstrom, M. R., Charboneau, J. W., Goetz, M. P., Rubin, J., Wong, G. Y., Sloan, J. A., Novotny, P. J., Lewis, B. D., Welch, T. J., Farrell, M. A., Maus, T. P., Lee, R. A., Reading, C. C., Petersen, I. A., & Pickett, D. D.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2002-07
Volume
224
Issue
1
Pages
87-97
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W1994409531
Cited by
317
References
18
FWCI
19.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Painful Metastases Involving Bone: Feasibility of Percutaneous CT- and US-guided Radio-frequency Ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2241011613
The paper
Callstrom, M. R., Charboneau, J. W., Goetz, M. P., Rubin, J., Wong, G. Y., Sloan, J. A., Novotny, P. J., Lewis, B. D., Welch, T. J., Farrell, M. A., Maus, T. P., Lee, R. A., Reading, C. C., Petersen, I. A., & Pickett, D. D. (2002). Painful Metastases Involving Bone: Feasibility of Percutaneous CT- and US-guided Radio-frequency Ablation. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2241011613

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.