The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Painful Metastases Involving Bone: Feasibility of Percutaneous CT- and US-guided Radio-frequency Ablation
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of radio-frequency (RF) ablation for pain reduction, quality of life improvement, and analgesics use reduction in patients with skeletal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 10 months, 12 adult patients with a single painful osteolytic metastasis in whom radiation therapy or chemotherapy had failed and who reported severe pain (pain score > or = 4 [scale of 0-10]) over a 24-hour period were treated with percutaneous imaging-guided RF ablation with a multi-tined electrode while under general anesthesia. Patient pain was measured with a Brief Pain Inventory 1 day after the procedure, every week for 1 month, and thereafter every other week (total follow-up, 6 months). Patient analgesics use was also recorded at these follow-up intervals. Follow-up contrast material-enhanced computed tomography was performed 1 week after the procedure. Complications were monitored. Analysis of the primary end point was undertaken with paired comparison procedures. RESULTS: Lesion size was 1-11 cm. Before RF ablation, mean worst pain score in a 24-hour period in 12 patients was 8.0 (range, 6-10). At 4 weeks after treatment, mean worst pain decreased to 3.1 (P =.001). Mean pain before treatment was 6.5 and decreased to 1.8 (P <.001) 4 weeks after treatment. Mean pain interference in general activity decreased from 6.6 to 2.7 (P =.002) 4 weeks after treatment. Eight of 10 patients using analgesics reported reduced use at some time after RF ablation. No serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: RF ablation of painful osteolytic metastases is safe, and the relief of pain is substantial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pain and Its Treatment in Outpatients with Metastatic Cancer
Cleeland, C. S., Gonin, R., Hatfield, A. K., Edmonson, J. H., Blum, R. H., Stewart, J. A., & Pandya, K. J. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199403033300902 · Cited by 2,019
Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases
Daut, R. L., Cleeland, C. S., & Flanery, R. C. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90143-4 · Cited by 1,562
Undertreatment of Medical Inpatients with Narcotic Analgesics
MARKS, R. M., & SACHAR, E. J. (1973) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-78-2-173 · Cited by 1,094
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Radio-frequency Ablation of Medium and Large Lesions
Livraghi, T., Goldberg, S. N., Lazzaroni, S., Meloni, F., Ierace, T., Solbiati, L., & Gazelle, G. S. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr02761 · Cited by 1,013
Von Roenn, J. H., Cleeland, C. S., Gonin, R., Hatfield, A. K., & Pandya, K. J. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-119-2-199307150-00005 · Cited by 826
Woolf, C. J., Allchorne, A., Safieh‐Garabedian, B., & Poole, S. (1997) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0701148 · Cited by 675
Radiofrequency Ablation of the Liver: Current Status
McGahan, J. P., & Dodd, G. D. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760003 · Cited by 583
Honore, P., Luger, N. M., Sabino, M. A. C., Schwei, M. J., Rogers, S. D., Mach, D. B., O'keefe, P. F., Ramnaraine, M. L., Clohisy, D. R., & Mantyh, P. W. (2000) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/74999 · Cited by 498
New Clinical-Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain in Patients with Cancer
Jacox, A., Carr, D. B., & Payne, R. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199403033300926 · Cited by 350
Fulfaro, F., Casuccio, A., Ticozzi, C., & Ripamonti, C. (1998) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00135-3 · Cited by 196
Cited by
Minimally invasive interventional procedures for metastatic bone disease: A comprehensive review
Papalexis, N., Parmeggiani, A., Peta, G., Spinnato, P., Miceli, M., & Facchini, G. (2022) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol29060332 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Callstrom, M. R., Charboneau, J. W., Goetz, M. P., Rubin, J., Wong, G. Y., Sloan, J. A., Novotny, P. J., Lewis, B. D., Welch, T. J., Farrell, M. A., Maus, T. P., Lee, R. A., Reading, C. C., Petersen, I. A., & Pickett, D. D.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 224
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-97
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1994409531
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 19.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Painful Metastases Involving Bone: Feasibility of Percutaneous CT- and US-guided Radio-frequency Ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2241011613
- The paper
- Callstrom, M. R., Charboneau, J. W., Goetz, M. P., Rubin, J., Wong, G. Y., Sloan, J. A., Novotny, P. J., Lewis, B. D., Welch, T. J., Farrell, M. A., Maus, T. P., Lee, R. A., Reading, C. C., Petersen, I. A., & Pickett, D. D. (2002). Painful Metastases Involving Bone: Feasibility of Percutaneous CT- and US-guided Radio-frequency Ablation. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2241011613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.