The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Undertreatment of Medical Inpatients with Narcotic Analgesics
Abstract
Structured interviews of 37 medical inpatients being treated with narcotic analgesics for pain showed that 32% of the patients were continuing to experience severe distress, despite the analgesic regimen, and another 41% were in moderate distress. Chart review suggested significant undertreatment with narcotics: meperidine in doses of 50 mg every 3 to 4 hours or less (if needed) was prescribed for 63% of the 37 patients; a dose of more than 75 mg was prescribed for only 1 patient. The average amount actually received per day by the patients was 90 mg. A questionnaire survey of 102 house staff physicians in two New York teaching hospitals showed considerable misinformation about meperidine. Many physicians underestimated the effective dose range, overestimated the duration of action, and exaggerated the dangers of addiction for medical inpatients receiving meperidine in a therapeutic dosage range. Physicians who exaggerated the dangers of addiction were more likely to prescribe lower doses of drugs, even for patients with terminal malignancy. The authors suggest that such misconceptions probably lead to undertreatment with narcotic analgesics, causing much needless suffering in medical inpatients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The unequal burden of pain: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain
Green, C. R., Anderson, K. O., Baker, T. A., Campbell, L. C., Decker, S., Fillingim, R. B., Kaloukalani, D. A., Lasch, K. E., Myers, C., Tait, R. C., et al. (2003) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03034.x · Cited by 1,248
A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief
Ventafridda, V., Tamburini, M., Caraceni, A., De Conno, F., & Naldi, F. (1987) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1 · Cited by 771
Trends in long‐term opioid therapy for chronic non‐cancer pain
Boudreau, D., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C. M., Saunders, K., Ray, G. T., Sullivan, M. D., Campbell, C. I., Merrill, J. O., Silverberg, M. J., Banta‐Green, C., et al. (2009) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.1833 · Cited by 522
A brief history of the opioid epidemic and strategies for pain medicine
Jones, M. R., Viswanath, O., Peck, J., Kaye, A. D., Gill, J. S., & Simopoulos, T. T. (2018) · Pain and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40122-018-0097-6 · Cited by 405
Desbiens, N. A., Wu, A. W., Broste, S. K., Wenger, N. S., Connors, A. F., Lynn, J., Yasui, Y., Phillips, R. S., & Fulkerson, W. (1996) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199612000-00005 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- MARKS, R. M., & SACHAR, E. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1973-02-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-181
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2093512375
- Cited by
- 1,094
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Undertreatment of Medical Inpatients with Narcotic Analgesics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-78-2-173
- The paper
- MARKS, R. M., & SACHAR, E. J. (1973). Undertreatment of Medical Inpatients with Narcotic Analgesics. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-78-2-173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.