Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PET Diagnostic Accuracy: Improvement with In-Line PET-CT System: Initial Results

Hany, Thomas F., Steinert, Hans C., Goerres, Gerhard W., Buck, Alfred, von Schulthess, Gustav K.·2002·Radiology

Abstract

The authors describe the initial application for tumor staging with an in-line system with a positron emission tomographic (PET) scanner and a multi-detector row helical computed tomographic (CT) scanner combined in one machine. Fifty-three patients underwent imaging with four CT tube currents and PET emission and transmission data acquisition. Stepwise analysis of coregistered images revealed a significant (P <.05, McNemar test) improvement in lesion classification between PET images alone and coregistered images from the PET-CT examination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2252011568

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Hany, T. F., Steinert, H. C., Goerres, G. W., Buck, A., & von Schulthess, G. K.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2002-11
Volume
225
Issue
2
Pages
575-581
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2153173584
Cited by
323
References
15
FWCI
24.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PET Diagnostic Accuracy: Improvement with In-Line PET-CT System: Initial Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2252011568
The paper
Hany, T. F., Steinert, H. C., Goerres, G. W., Buck, A., & von Schulthess, G. K. (2002). PET Diagnostic Accuracy: Improvement with In-Line PET-CT System: Initial Results. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2252011568

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.