Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Maturity: US Evaluation [letter]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rodrigues et al. reported that physical examination revealed that experienced nurses achieved greater accuracy (80%) in predicting AVF maturity.
“Rodrigues et al. (38) reported that physical examination revealed that experienced nurses achieved greater accuracy (80%) in predicting AVF maturity.”
From Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for hemodialysis vascular access: a Delphi study (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, Y., He, L., Tang, S., Gao, Y., Chen, H., Shi, M., & Chen, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1858484
- Authors
- Turmel-Rodrigues, L. A., Bourquelot, P., & Pengloan, J.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 227
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 906-907
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2138765234
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
- Keywords
- hemodialysis, arteriovenous fistula, fistula maturation, ultrasound evaluation, vascular access
- MeSH terms
- Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical, Forearm, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Ultrasonography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
