The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Vascular Characteristics with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging—Initial Experience
Abstract
PURPOSE: To use contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and a distributed-parameter tracer kinetics model for prospectively evaluating the vascular characteristics of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients between 57 and 76 years of age (mean age, 67 years) with histologically proved adenocarcinoma of the prostate were examined by using three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T. The local research ethics committee approved this study, and written consent was obtained from all patients. Data from regions of interest drawn in tumor, normal-appearing peripheral zone tissue, and muscle were analyzed to provide estimates of perfusion, blood volume, interstitial volume, and microvascular permeability-surface area product. These estimates were compared by using the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Mean blood flow was significantly (P < .001) higher in 22 prostate tumors than in 20 contralateral peripheral zones (66 vs 32 mL/100 mL/min). Similarly, the interstitial distribution volume in tumors was enlarged compared with the interstitial distribution volume in normal peripheral zones (42 vs 27 mL/100 mL). Blood volume and microvascular permeability-surface area product values in tumors (1.0 mL/100 mL and 22 mL/100 mL/min, respectively) were similar to estimated values in peripheral zone tissue (1.5 mL/100 mL and 21 mL/100 mL/min, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings show considerable promise for isolating vascular characteristics of prostate cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Hricak, H., Choyke, P. L., Eberhardt, S. C., Leibel, S. A., & Scardino, P. T. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2431030580 · Cited by 601
25 Years of Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Developments, Current Challenges and Future Perspectives
Lohrke, J., Frenzel, T., Endrikat, J., Alves, F. C., Grist, T. M., Law, M., Lee, J. M., Leiner, T., Li, K.-C., Nikolaou, K., et al. (2016) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0275-4 · Cited by 420
Sourbron, S., Ingrisch, M., Siefert, A., Reiser, M., & Herrmann, K. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22005 · Cited by 276
Direct parametric reconstruction from undersampled (k,t)-space data in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI
Dikaios, N., Arridge, S., Hamy, V., Punwani, S., & Atkinson, D. (2014) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2014.05.001 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckley, D. L., Roberts, C., Parker, G. J. M., Logue, J. P., & Hutchinson, C. E.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 233
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 709-715
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2098221867
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Vascular Characteristics with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging—Initial Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2333032098
- The paper
- Buckley, D. L., Roberts, C., Parker, G. J. M., Logue, J. P., & Hutchinson, C. E. (2004). Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Vascular Characteristics with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging—Initial Experience. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333032098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.