The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi–Detector Row CT Systems and Image-Reconstruction Techniques
Abstract
The introduction in 1998 of multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) by the major CT vendors was a milestone with regard to increased scan speed, improved z-axis spatial resolution, and better utilization of the available x-ray power. In this review, the general technical principles of multi-detector row CT are reviewed as they apply to the established four- and eight-section systems, the most recent 16-section scanners, and future generations of multi-detector row CT systems. Clinical examples are used to demonstrate both the potential and the limitations of the different scanner types. When necessary, standard single-section CT is referred to as a common basis and starting point for further developments. Another focus is the increasingly important topic of patient radiation exposure, successful dose management, and strategies for dose reduction. Finally, the evolutionary steps from traditional single-section spiral image-reconstruction algorithms to the most recent approaches toward multisection spiral reconstruction are traced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Brenner, D. J., Elliston, C. D., Hall, E. J., & Berdon, W. E. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 · Cited by 3,222 · cited 1×
“—Radiation exposure to the patient at CT and the resulting potential radiation hazard have recently gained considerable attention in both the public and the scientific literature (30,31).”
Background
Cited by
CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques
Boas, F. E., & Fleischmann, D. (2012) · Imaging in Medicine · doi:10.2217/iim.12.13 · Cited by 848
Schroeder, S., Achenbach, S., Bengel, F., Burgstahler, C., Cademartiri, F., de Feyter, P., George, R., Kaufmann, P., Kopp, A. F., Knuuti, J., et al. (2008) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm544 · Cited by 554
Lin, C.-L., Tawhai, M. H., McLennan, G., & Hoffman, E. A. (2007) · Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.resp.2007.02.006 · Cited by 317
Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento‐alveolar trauma. Part 1: traumatic injuries
Cohenca, N., Simon, J. H., Roges, R., Morag, Y., & Malfaz, J. M. (2007) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00509.x · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Flohr, T. G., Schaller, S., Stierstorfer, K., Bruder, H., Ohnesorge, B. M., & Schoepf, U. J.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 235
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 756-773
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2159519445
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi–Detector Row CT Systems and Image-Reconstruction Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2353040037
- The paper
- Flohr, T. G., Schaller, S., Stierstorfer, K., Bruder, H., Ohnesorge, B. M., & Schoepf, U. J. (2005). Multi–Detector Row CT Systems and Image-Reconstruction Techniques. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.