Cited by 209Dental Radiography and ImagingDental Trauma and TreatmentsFacial Trauma and Fracture Management

Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento‐alveolar trauma. Part 1: traumatic injuries

Open access
Cohenca, Nestor, Simon, James H., Roges, Ramon, Morag, Yoav, Malfaz, Jose Maria·2007·Dental Traumatology

Abstract

Abstract – Traumatized teeth present a clinical challenge with regard to their diagnosis, treatment plan, and prognosis. Recent developments in imaging systems have enabled clinicians to visualize structural changes effectively. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and cone beam computed tomography are among the most commonly used systems for dental and maxillofacial surgery. The purpose of this review is to describe the advantages and disadvantages of each technique and the clinical application for dento‐alveolar trauma. Three clinical cases are described to illustrate the potential use of the NewTom 3G for diagnosis and treatment plan of dento‐alveolar traumatic injuries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00509.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cone beam computerized tomography provides enhanced visualization of traumatic dental injuries, particularly root fractures, crown/root fractures and lateral luxations, and can help determine fracture location, extent and direction.

    “Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides enhanced visualization of TDIs, particularly root fractures, crown/root fractures and lateral luxations. CBCT helps to determine the location, extent and direction of a fracture. In these specific injuries, 3D imaging can be useful and should be considered, if available. 10-12”

    From International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations. (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion says CBCT improved diagnosis of traumatic injuries, and Case 1 shows it revealing the location and oblique course of a root fracture. Case 2 shows CBCT disclosing a more severe lateral luxation than radiographs indicated. The paper does not specifically address crown/root fractures, so that part of the attributed list is unsupported (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides enhanced visualization of traumatic dental injuries, particularly root fractures, crown/root fractures and lateral luxations.

    “Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides enhanced visualization of TDIs, particularly root fractures, crown/root fractures and lateral luxations.”

    From International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations. (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page not available) says CBCT improved diagnosis of traumatic injuries. Case 1 shows CBCT revealing details of a root fracture, and Case 2 shows it revealing a more severe lateral luxation than radiographs suggested. The passages do not establish the claimed benefit specifically for crown/root fractures. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBCT helps to determine the location, extent and direction of a fracture.

    “CBCT helps to determine the location, extent and direction of a fracture.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [31]31. Laine FJ, Conway WF, Laskin DM. Radiology of maxillo- facial trauma. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 1993;22:145-88.
  2. [47]47. Gahleitner A, Solar P, Nasel C, Homolka P, Youssefzadeh S, Ertl L et al. Magnetic resonance tomography in dental radiology (dental MRI). Radiologe 1999;39:1044-50.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohenca, N., Simon, J. H., Roges, R., Morag, Y., & Malfaz, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Cohenca, Nestor
Venue
Dental Traumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-05
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
95-104
ISSN
  • 1600-4469 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-9657
OpenAlex
W2070157219
Cited by
209
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dental Traumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Dental Trauma and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Keywords
dental trauma, digital imaging, cone-beam computed tomography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, treatment planning, maxillofacial surgery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Dental Pulp Necrosis, Humans, Incisor, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Maxilla, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Tooth Fractures, Tooth Avulsion, Tooth Root, Tooth Injuries, Radiography, Dental, Digital, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review