Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vertebral Bone Mineral Density, Marrow Perfusion, and Fat Content in Healthy Men and Men with Osteoporosis: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopy

Griffith, James F., Yeung, David K. W., Antonio, Gregory E., Lee, Francis K. H., Hong, Athena W. L., Wong, Samuel Y. S., Lau, Edith M. C., Leung, Ping Chung·2005·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively use hydrogen 1 (1H) magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging to measure vertebral body marrow fat content and bone marrow perfusion in older men with varying bone mineral densities as documented with dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval, and all participants provided informed consent. DXA, 1H MR spectroscopy, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the lumbar spine were performed in 90 men (mean age, 73 years; range, 67-101 years). Vertebral marrow fat content and perfusion (maximum enhancement and enhancement slope) were compared for subject groups with differing bone densities (normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic). The t test was used for comparisons between groups, and the Pearson test was used to determine correlation between marrow fat content and perfusion indexes. RESULTS: Eight subjects were excluded, yielding a final cohort of 82 subjects (mean age, 73 years; range, 67-101 years) that included 42 subjects with normal bone density (mean T score, 0.8 +/- 1.1 [standard deviation]), 23 subjects with osteopenia (mean T score, -1.6 +/- 0.4), and 17 subjects with osteoporosis (mean T score, -3.2 +/- 0.5). Vertebral marrow fat content was significantly increased in subjects with osteoporosis (mean fat content, 58.23% +/- 7.8) (P = .002) or osteopenia (mean fat content, 55.68% +/- 10.2) (P = .034) compared with that in subjects with normal bone density (50.45% +/- 8.7). Vertebral marrow perfusion indexes were significantly decreased in osteoporotic subjects (mean enhancement slope, 0.78%/sec +/- 0.3) compared with those in osteopenic subjects (mean enhancement slope, 1.15%/sec +/- 0.6) (P = .007) and those in subjects with normal bone density (mean enhancement slope, 1.48%/sec +/- 0.7) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Subjects with osteoporosis have decreased vertebral marrow perfusion and increased marrow fat compared with these parameters in subjects with osteopenia. Similarly, subjects with osteopenia have decreased vertebral marrow perfusion and increased marrow fat compared with these parameters in subjects with normal bone density.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2363041425

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Griffith, J. F., Yeung, D. K. W., Antonio, G. E., Lee, F. K. H., Hong, A. W. L., Wong, S. Y. S., Lau, E. M. C., & Leung, P. C.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2005-09
Volume
236
Issue
3
Pages
945-951
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2089611441
Cited by
440
References
0
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertebral Bone Mineral Density, Marrow Perfusion, and Fat Content in Healthy Men and Men with Osteoporosis: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2363041425
The paper
Griffith, J. F., Yeung, D. K. W., Antonio, G. E., Lee, F. K. H., Hong, A. W. L., Wong, S. Y. S., Lau, E. M. C., & Leung, P. C. (2005). Vertebral Bone Mineral Density, Marrow Perfusion, and Fat Content in Healthy Men and Men with Osteoporosis: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopy. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2363041425

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.