The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society
Abstract
Lung nodules are detected very commonly on computed tomographic (CT) scans of the chest, and the ability to detect very small nodules improves with each new generation of CT scanner. In reported studies, up to 51% of smokers aged 50 years or older have pulmonary nodules on CT scans. However, the existing guidelines for follow-up and management of noncalcified nodules detected on nonscreening CT scans were developed before widespread use of multi-detector row CT and still indicate that every indeterminate nodule should be followed with serial CT for a minimum of 2 years. This policy, which requires large numbers of studies to be performed at considerable expense and with substantial radiation exposure for the affected population, has not proved to be beneficial or cost-effective. During the past 5 years, new information regarding prevalence, biologic characteristics, and growth rates of small lung cancers has become available; thus, the authors believe that the time-honored requirement to follow every small indeterminate nodule with serial CT should be revised. In this statement, which has been approved by the Fleischner Society, the pertinent data are reviewed, the authors' conclusions are summarized, and new guidelines are proposed for follow-up and management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MacMahon, H., Naidich, D. P., Goo, J. M., Lee, K. S., Leung, A. N. C., Mayo, J. R., Mehta, A. C., Ohno, Y., Powell, C. A., Prokop, M., et al. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161659 · Cited by 2,491
Self-citationTravis, W. D., Asamura, H., Bankier, A. A., Beasley, M. B., Detterbeck, F., Flieder, D. B., Goo, J. M., MacMahon, H., Naidich, D., Nicholson, A. G., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.025 · Cited by 722
Self-citationPerformance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: A Retrospective Assessment
Pinsky, P. F., Gierada, D. S., Black, W., Munden, R., Nath, H., Aberle, D., & Kazerooni, E. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2086 · Cited by 508
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2020
Motzer, R. J., Jonasch, E., Michaelson, M. D., Nandagopal, L., Gore, J. L., George, S., Alva, A., Haas, N., Harrison, M. R., Plimack, E. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0054 · Cited by 287
Howard, B. A., Morgan, R., Thorpe, M. P., Turkington, T. G., Oldan, J., James, O. G., & Borges-Neto, S. (2017) · Annals of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12149-017-1192-1 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- MacMahon, H., Austin, J. H. M., Gamsu, G., Herold, C. J., Jett, J. R., Naidich, D. P., Patz, E. F., & Swensen, S. J.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 237
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 395-400
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1999529880
- Cited by
- 1,574
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2372041887
- The paper
- MacMahon, H., Austin, J. H. M., Gamsu, G., Herold, C. J., Jett, J. R., Naidich, D. P., Patz, E. F., & Swensen, S. J. (2005). Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2372041887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.