Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tumors in Pediatric Patients at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Tumor Cellularity

Humphries, Paul D., Sebire, Neil J., Siegel, Marilyn J., Olsen, Øystein E.·2007·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess whether there is a relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the histopathologic cell count and whether the ADC can enable differentiation of benign and malignant extracranial mass lesions in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional ethics approval and parent or guardian consent were obtained. Eleven malignant and eight benign lesions in 19 children (11 girls, eight boys; median age, 3.9 years; age range, 11 days to 15.5 years) who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of extracranial mass lesions-including a diffusion-weighted sequence (with b values 0, 500, and 1000 sec/mm(2))-and histopathologic analysis to prove findings were studied. The median ADC within each mass lesion was compared with the median cell count for 10 high-power microscopic fields in the specimen. The inverse regression between cell count and ADC was calculated. The difference in ADC between benign and malignant lesions was assessed by using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: There was an inverse relationship between ADC and cell count, expressed as ADC (in x10(-3) mm(2)/sec) = 0.56 + (66.2/cell count), with a relatively good fit to the observed data (analysis of variance R(2) = 0.541, F = 20.0, P < .001). The ADCs of benign lesions ranged from (0.84-2.83) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (median, 1.35 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; standard deviation, 0.68). The ADCs of malignant lesions ranged from (0.73-1.53) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (median, 1.00 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; standard deviation, 0.29). There was no significant difference in ADC between benign and malignant lesions (Mann-Whitney U = 22, P = .069). All highly cellular (>150 cells per high-power field) lesions had an ADC lower than 1.5 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec. CONCLUSION: Although there is a significant relationship between cellularity and ADC, cell count probably is not the sole determinant of the ADC. Use of the ADC cannot enable accurate differentiation of malignant and benign lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2452061535

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Humphries, P. D., Sebire, N. J., Siegel, M. J., & Olsen, Ø. E.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2007-12
Volume
245
Issue
3
Pages
848-854
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2099871422
Cited by
266
References
2
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumors in Pediatric Patients at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Tumor Cellularity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2452061535
The paper
Humphries, P. D., Sebire, N. J., Siegel, M. J., & Olsen, Ø. E. (2007). Tumors in Pediatric Patients at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Tumor Cellularity. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2452061535

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.